ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A comparison of TCP performance over three routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks
Full text PdfPdf (205 KB)
Source International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking & Computing archive
Proceedings of the 2nd ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking & computing table of contents
Long Beach, CA, USA
Session: Routing and transport table of contents
Pages: 56 - 66  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:1-58113-428-2
Authors
Thomas D. Dyer  Computer Science Division, The Univ. of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX
Rajendra V. Boppana  Computer Science Division, The Univ. of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX
Sponsor
SIGMOBILE: ACM Special Interest Group on Mobility of Systems, Users, Data and Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: 10.1145/501422.501425

ABSTRACT

We examine the performance of the TCP protocol for bulk-data transfers in mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs). We vary the number of TCP connections and compare the performances of three recently proposed on-demand (AODV and DSR) and adaptive proactive (ADV) routing algorithms. It has been shown in the literature that the congestion control mechanism of TCP reacts adversely to packet losses due to temporarily broken routes in wireless networks. So, we prospose a simple heuristic, called fixed RTO, to distinguish between route loss and network congestion and thereby improve the performance of the routing algorithms. Using the ns-2 simulator, we evaluate the performances of the three routing algorithms with the standard TCP Reno protocol and Reno with fixed RTO. Our results indicate that the proactive ADV algorithm performs well under a variety of conditions and that the fixed RTO technique improves the performances of the two on-demand algorithms significantly


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
A. Ahuja et al., "Performance of TCP over different routing protocols in mobile ad-hoc networks," Proceedings of IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC 2000), Tokyo, Japan, May 2000.
 
2
 
3
H. Balakrishnan et al., "Improving reliable transport and handoff performance in cellular wireless networks," in ACM SIGCOMM, Aug. 1996.
4
 
5
R. Boppana and S. Konduru, "An adaptive distance vector routing algorithm for mobile, ad hoc networks," in IEEE Infocom 2001, Mar. 2001.
6
 
7
 
8
CMU Monarch Group, "CMU Monarch extensions to the NS-2 simulator." Available from http://monarch.cs.cmu.edu/cmu-ns.html, 1998.
 
9
S. R. Das, C. E. Perkins, and E. M. Royer, "Performance comparison of two on-demand routing protocols for ad hoc networks," in IEEE Infocom 2000, Mar. 2000.
 
10
R. Dube et al., "Signal stability based adaptive routing (SSA) for ad-hoc mobile networks," in IEEE Personal Communications, Feb. 1997.
 
11
K. Fall and K. Varadhan, "NS notes and documentation." The VINT Project, UC Berkeley, LBL, USC/ISI, and Xerox PARC. Available from http://www-mash.cs.berkeley.edu/ns, Nov. 1997.
 
12
C. Hedrick, "Routing information protocol." RFC 1058, 1988.
13
 
14
IEEE Computer Society LAN/MAN Standards Committee, "Wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications." IEEE Std. 802.11-1997. IEEE, New York, NY 1997.
15
 
16
D. B. Johnson et al., "The dynamic source routing protocol for mobile adhoc networks." IETF Internet Draft. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietfmanet-dsr-02.txt, 1999.
 
17
S.Lee, Mario Gerla, and C.K.Toh, "A simulation study of table-driven and on-demand routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks," in IEEE Network Magazine, Aug. 1999.
 
18
C. E. Perkins, E. M. Royer, and S. R. Das, "Ad hoc on demand distance vector routing." IETF Internet Draft. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-manetaodv-03.txt, 1999.
19
 
20
N. Vaidya et al., "Delayed duplicate acknowledgements: a TCP-unaware approach to improve performance of TCP over wireless" Technical Report 99-003, Dept. of computer Science, Texas A&M University, Feb. 1999.

CITED BY  26
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Collaborative Colleagues:
Thomas D. Dyer: colleagues
Rajendra V. Boppana: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: