The designer as user: building requirements for design tools from design practice

ABSTRACT

Software tools that support the design and development of interactive computing systems are an exciting possibility. The potential pay-off is great: user interface management systems, for example, promise not only to speed the process of specifying, implementing and maintaining user interface code, but also to guide the content of the user interfaces they support. As for any tool intended for human use, however, the success of software design tools will hinge on a thorough understanding of the problems they seek to address—design as it is practiced in the real world.

REFERENCES

• 1: Bennett, J.L. Managing to meet usability requirements: Establishing and meeting software development goals. In Visual Display Terminals, }. Bennett, D. Case, J. Sandelin, and M. Smith, Eds. Prentice- Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1984, pp. 161-184.
• 2: William L. Bewley , Teresa L. Roberts , David Schroit , William L. Verplank, Human factors testing in the design of Xerox's 8010 “Star” office workstation, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, p.72-77, December 12-15, 1983, Boston, Massachusetts, United States [doi>10.1145/800045.801584]
• 3: Barry W. Boehm , Terence E. Gray , Thomas Seewaldt, Prototyping versus specifying: a multiproject experiment, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.10 n.3, p.290-302, May 1984
• 4: W. Buxton , M. R. Lamb , D. Sherman , K. C. Smith, Towards a comprehensive user interface management system, Proceedings of the 10th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, p.35-42, July 25-29, 1983, Detroit, Michigan, United States
• 5: Carroll, J.M., and Campbell, R.L. Artifacts as psychological theories: The case of human-computer interaction. Res. Rep. RC 13454, IBM T.J. Watson Research, Yorktown Heights, N.Y., 1986.
• 6: Carroll, J.M., and Campbell, R.L. Softening up hard science: Reply to Newell and Card. Hum.-Comput. Interaction 2, 3 (1986), 227-294.
• 7: Carroll, J.M., and Rosson, M.B. Usability specifications as a tool in iterative development. In Vol. 1, Advances in Human-Computer Interaction. H.R. Hartson, Ed. Ablex, Norwood, N.J., 1985, pp. 1-28.
• 8: Carroll, J.M., and Soloway, E. The evolving role of software psychology in software development practice. IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, N.Y., 1988.
• 9: Waltraud Dehning , Heidrun Essig , Susanne Maass, Adaptation of Virtual Man-Computer Interfaces to User Requirements in Dialogs, Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., Secaucus, NJ, 1981
• 10: Carolanne Fisher, Advancing the study of programming with computer-aided protocol analysis, Empirical studies of programmers: second workshop, Ablex Publishing Corp., Norwood, NJ, 1987
• 11: John D. Gould , Clayton Lewis, Designing for usability: key principles and what designers think, Communications of the ACM, v.28 n.3, p.300-311, March 1985 [doi>10.1145/3166.3170]
• 12: John D. Gould , Stephen J. Boies , Stephen Levy , John T. Richards , Jim Schoonard, The 1984 Olympic Message System: a test of behavioral principles of system design, Communications of the ACM, v.30 n.9, p.758-769, Sept. 1987 [doi>10.1145/30401.30402]
• 13: Mark Green, The University of Alberta user interface management system, ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, v.19 n.3, p.205-213, Jul. 1985
• 14: Guindon, R., Curtis, B., and Krasner, H. A model of cognitive processes in software design: An analysis of breakdowns in early design activities by individuals. Tech. Rep. STP-283-87. MCC, Austin, Texas, 1987.
• 15: N. Hammond , A. Jørgensen , A. MacLean , P. Barnard , J. Long, Design practice and interface usability: Evidence from interviews with designers, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, p.40-44, December 12-15, 1983, Boston, Massachusetts, United States [doi>10.1145/800045.801577]
• 16: Kellogg, W.A. Conceptual consistency in the user interface: Effects on user performance. In Human-Computer Interaction--INTERACT '87, H.-J. Bullinger, and B. Shackel, Eds. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1987, pp. 389-394.
• 17: S Lammers, Programmers at work, Harper & Row Publishers, Inc., New York, NY, 1986
• 18: Susanne Maaß , Mary Beth Rosson , Wendy A. Kellogg, Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Systemkonsistenz und andere schwer definierbare Prinzipien: Interviews mit Systementwicklern, Software-Ergonomie '87, Nützen Informationssysteme dem Benutzer?, Tagung II/1987 des German Chapter of the ACM, p.417-427, April 27-29, 1987
• 19: Brad A. Myers , William Buxton, Creating highly-interactive and graphical user interfaces by demonstration, ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, v.20 n.4, p.249-258, Aug. 1986
• 20: Allen Newell, Human Problem Solving, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1972
• 21: Dan R Olsen, Jr. , Elizabeth P. Dempsey, SYNGRAPH: A graphical user interface generator, ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, v.17 n.3, p.43-50, July 1983
• 22: D L Parnas , P C Clements, A rational design process: How and why to fake it, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.12 n.2, p.251-257, Feb. 1986
• 23: Payne, S.J., and Green, T.R.G. Task action grammars: A model of the mental representation of task languages. Hum.-Comput. Interaction 2, 2 (1986), 93-133.
• 24: Rosson, M.B. Guiding design with user interface design tools. Res. Rep. RC 13166. IBM T.J. Watson Research, Yorktown Heights, N.Y., 1987.
• 25: Mary Beth Rosson , Susanne Maass , Wendy A. Kellogg, Designing for designers: an analysis of design practice in the real world, Proceedings of the SIGCHI/GI conference on Human factors in computing systems and graphics interface, p.137-142, April 05-09, 1987, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
• 26: John L. Sibert , William D. Hurley , Teresa W. Bleser, An object-oriented user interface management system, ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, v.20 n.4, p.259-268, Aug. 1986
• 27: Ludwig Slusky, Integrating software modelling and prototyping tools, Information and Software Technology, v.29 n.7, p.379-387, Sept. 1987 [doi>10.1016/0950-5849(87)90205-9]
• 28: Tanner, P.P., and Buxton, W. Some issues in future user interface management systems. In User Interface Management Systems, G.E. Pfaff, Ed. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985, pp. 67-80.
• 29: Joyce J. Elam , Diane B. Walz , Herb Krasner , Bill Curtis, A methodology for studying software design teams: an investigation of conflict behaviors in the requirements definition phase, Empirical studies of programmers: second workshop, Ablex Publishing Corp., Norwood, NJ, 1987
• 30: John Whiteside , Dennis Wixon, Improving human-computer interaction—a quest for cognitive science, Interfacing thought: cognitive aspects of human-computer interaction, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1987
• 31: Stephen S. Yau , Jeffery J.-P. Tsai, A survey of software design techniques, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.12 n.6, p.713-721, June 1986

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
      D.2.2 Design Tools and Techniques
          Subjects: User interfaces

Additional Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
  D.m MISCELLANEOUS
      Subjects: Software psychology**

General Terms:
Design, Experimentation, Human Factors