Legal data modeling: The prohibited transaction exemption analyst

ABSTRACT

This paper addresses issues in the design of legal expert systems. The emphasis is on the nature of the underlying knowledge that is incorporated in the knowledge base of a legal expert system. Examples of different approaches are discussed. The “legal data modeling” approach, used by the author in the construction of an expert system, is described. Legal data modeling emphasizes the construction of a conceptual model of situations in which legal problem solving occurs.

REFERENCES

• 1: Allen,L.E. "Towards a normalized language to clarify the structure of legal discourse," in Deontic Loaic. Computational Linquistics_ and Leqa! Information Systems, v. II. Martino, A.A. (ed.) North-Holland Publishing, 1982, pp. 349-407.
• 2: Borgida, A. et at. ,,Generalization/ specialization as a basis for software in {Brodie, 1984} pp. 87-117specification,
• 3: Brodie, M.L. et al. (eds.) On conceDtual m odelinq. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1984.
• 4: Michael L Brodie , John Mylopoulos, On knowledge base management systems: integrating artificial intelligence and d atabase technologies, Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., New York, NY, 1986
• 5: Buchanan, B.G. and Shortliffe, E.H. (eds.) Ru!e-basedexDert systems. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass. 1984.
• 6: Carlis, J.V. boqical data structures. Univ. of Minn. Computer science Dept. 1985.
• 7: Peter Pin-Shan Chen, The entity-relationship model—toward a unified view of data, ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS), v.1 n.1, p.9-36, March 1976 [doi>10.1145/320434.320440]
• 8: William J. Clancey, Heuristic classification, Artificial Intelligence, v.27 n.3, p.289-350, Dec. 1985 [doi>10.1016/0004-3702(85)90016-5]
• 9: Heather, M.A. "Semiotic orders in law, presented at Second Annual Conference on Law and Technology, University of Houston Law Center, June, 1985.
• 10: Israel, D.J. and Brachman, R.J. "Some remarks on the semantics of representation languages" in {Brodie 1984} DP 119-146. 7 Campbell_Law Review 120 (Fall
• 11: Johnson, P.E. et al. "Expertise in trial advocacy, 1984) .
• 12: Kolodner, J.L. "Towards an under-standing of the role of experience in the evolution from novice to expert," I nt.J. Man-Machine Studies v. 19 (1983) pp. 497-518.
• 13: Levi, E.H. _An intrgduction to Leqal reasoninq. University of Chicago, 1949.
• 14: MacRae, C.D. "User control knowledge in a tax consulting system," in Artificial intelliqence in economics and management, Pau, L.F. (ed) Elsevier Science Pub, B.V. (North-Holland) 1986, p. 193.
• 15: J. A. Meldman, A PRELIMINARY STUDY IN COMPUTER-AIDED LEGAL ANALYSIS, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 1975
• 16: M. J. Sergot , F. Sadri , R. A. Kowalski , F. Kriwaczek , P. Hammond , H. T. Cory, The British Nationality Act as a logic program, Communications of the ACM, v.29 n.5, p.370-386, May 1986 [doi>10.1145/5689.5920]
• 17: Winston, P.H. "Learning new principles from precedents and exercises," Artificial Intelligence v. 19 (1982) pp. 321-350.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.2 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
      I.2.1 Applications and Expert Systems
          Subjects: Industrial automation

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.1 MODELS AND PRINCIPLES
      H.1.2 User/Machine Systems
          Subjects: Human information processing
  H.2 DATABASE MANAGEMENT
      H.2.1 Logical Design
          Subjects: Data models

General Terms:
Design, Theory