ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Performance evaluation of UDP lite for cellular video
Full text PdfPdf (308 KB)
Source International Workshop on Network and Operating System Support for Digital Audio and Video archive
Proceedings of the 11th international workshop on Network and operating systems support for digital audio and video table of contents
Port Jefferson, New York, United States
Pages: 117 - 124  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:1-58113-370-7
Authors
Amoolya Singh  Computer Science Division, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
Almudena Konrad  Computer Science Division, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
Anthony D. Joseph  Computer Science Division, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
Sponsors
SIGCOMM: ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication
SIGMULTIMEDIA: ACM Special Interest Group on Multimedia
SIGOPS: ACM Special Interest Group on Operating Systems
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 34,   Citation Count: 5
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/378344.378362
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The current generation of wireless links pose a significant challenge for sending video streams, as these links have low bit rate and high error rate compared to wired links. Sending high bit rate delay-sensitive traffic over wireless links requires appropriate error resilient video compression algorithms and transport/link layer protocols. We have built a wireless video system using an off-the-shelf error resilient low bit rate video codec with our implementations of UDP Lite and PPP Lite, which are modifications to transport and link layer protocols respectively. The flexible checksumming schemes in these protocols allow error-resilient application policies to be reflected in the networking stack. We conducted simulations and experimental evaluations of this wireless video system using quantitative performance metrics (i.e., throughput, jitter, packet loss, and end-to-end latency).


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
ActiveSky Corp. http://www.activesky.com/.
 
2
E. G. T. S. 04.22. GSM Radio Link Protocol for data and telematic services, Dec 1995.
 
3
C. Bettstetter, H.-J. V.ogel, and J. Ebersp. acher. GSM Phase 2+ General Packet Radio Service GPRS: Architecture, Protocols, and Air Interface. IEEE Communications Surveys, 2(3):2-14, 1999.
4
 
5
C. Bormann, L. Cline, G. Deisher, T. Gardos, C. Maciocco, D. Newell, J. Ott, G. SUllivan, S. Wenger, and C. Zhu. RTP Payload Format for the 1998 Version of ITU-T Rec. H.263 Video (H.263+). RFC 2429, Oct 1998.
 
6
M. Budagavi, W. R. Heinzelman, J. Webb, and R. Talluri. Wireless MPEG-4 Video Communication on DSP Chips. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, January 2000.
7
 
8
Comet Group. Columbia University. http: //comet.columbia.edu/mobiware/overview.html.
 
9
M. T. et al. DoCoMo's Exhibits for Telecom '99. NTT DoCoMo Technical Journal, 1(3):32-40, Mar 2000.
10
 
11
I.-T. R. H.263. Video Coding for Low Bit Rate Communication, Feb 1998.
 
12
L. Larzon, M. Degermark, and S. Pink. UDP Lite for Real-Time Multimedia Applications. Proceedings of the Sixth IEEE International Workshop on Mobile Multimedia Communications, 1999.
13
14
 
15
R. Ludwig and B. Raythoni. Link Layer Enhancements for TCP/IP over GSM. In Proceedings of IEEE Infocom, 1999.
16
 
17
 
18
MPEG4 Overview. http://drogo.cselt.stet.it/ mpeg/standards/mpeg-4/mpeg-4.htm.
 
19
NEC Corp., Japan. http://www.nec.com/.
 
20
R. Neff and A. Zakhor. Very low bit rate video coding based on matching pursuits. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 7.1:158-171, 1997.
 
21
PacketVideo Corp., San Diego, CA. http://www.packetvideo.com/.
 
22
R. Puri, K. Ramchandran, and A. Ortega. Joint source channel coding with hybrid FEC/ARQ for buffer constrained video transmission. In Proceedings of Multimedia Signal Processing, 1998.
 
23
M. Rahnema. Overview of the GSM System and Protocol Architecture. IEEE Communications Magazine, pages 92-100, April 1993.
24
 
25
H. Schulzrinne, S. Casner, R. Frederick, and V. Jacobson. RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time Applications. RFC 1889, Dec 1995.
 
26
W. Simpson. The point-to-point protocol. RFC 1661, Jul 1994.
 
27
R. Steinmetz and C. Engler. Human perception of media synchronization. Technical Report 43.9310, IBM European Networking Center, Oct. 1993.
 
28
Y. Wang and Q.-F. Zhu. Error Control and Concealment for Video Communication: A Review. Proceedings of the IEEE, 86(5):974-997, May 1998.
 
29
Q. Zhang and S. A. Kassam. Hybrid ARQ with Selective Combining for Video Transmission over Wireless Channels. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, 1997.
 
30
C. Zhu. RTP Payload Format for H.263 Video Streams. RFC 2190, Sep 1997.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Amoolya Singh: colleagues
Almudena Konrad: colleagues
Anthony D. Joseph: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: