ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Automatic adjustment of invalid feature models
Full text PdfPdf (988 KB)
Source ACM Symposium on Solid and Physical Modeling archive
Proceedings of the sixth ACM symposium on Solid modeling and applications table of contents
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Pages: 267 - 277  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:1-58113-366-9
Authors
Alex Noort  Computer Graphics and CAD/CAM Group, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands
Willem F. Bronsvoort  Computer Graphics and CAD/CAM Group, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands
Sponsor
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 9,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/376957.376988
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In current feature modeling systems, all dimensions in a model have to be fully specified by the user. It is desirable that systems become more flexible in this respect, i.e. that non-critical dimensions in a model can be declared as variant, and that the model can be automatically adjusted when this is appropriate.

A method and an implementation to realize this will be described. The underlying feature model definition and validation approach will be introduced. Validation is done by a collection of constraint solvers. An overview of invalid situations in which automatic model adjustment can be applied will be given. The constrain solving scheme and, in particular, the automatic model adjustment strategies for different types of constraints will elaborated.

Applications in the areas of design by features, creating a member from a family of products, and feature conversion will be given. These will illustrate that automatic feature model adjustment is a very useful concept.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
 
3
R. Bidarra, K. J. de Kraker, and W. F. Bronsvoort. Representation and management of feature information in a cellular model. Computer-Aided Design, 30(4):301-313, 1998.
 
4
M. H. P. J. Dohmen. Constraint-based Feature Validation. PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology, 1997.
 
5
B. N. Freeman-Benson, J. Maloney, and A. Boming. The DeltaBlue algorithm: An incremental constraint hierarchy solver. Technical Report 89-08-06, University of Washington, USA, 1990.
 
6
 
7
 
8
G. A. Kramer. Solving Geometric Constraint Systems: a Case Study in Kinematics. The MIT Press, 1992.
 
9
 
10
A. Noort, R, Bidarra, and W. F. Bronsvoort. Satisfying interaction constraints. In: U. Cugini and M. Wozny, editors, Seventh IFIP WG 5.2 Workshop on Geometric Modeling: Fundamentals and Applications - GE07, pages 51-64. University of Parma, 2000.
 
11
A. Noort and W. F. Bronsvoort. Automatic model adjustment in form feature conversion. In: CD-ROMProceedings of the 1999 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences'. ASME, 1999.
 
12
W. C. Regli and D. M. Caines. Catalog of the NIST design, planning, and assembly repository. Technical report, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, 1996. http://edge.msc.drexel.edu/repository.
 
13
M. Sannella. The SkyBlue constraint solver. Technical Report 92-07-02, Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington, USA, 1992.
 
14

Collaborative Colleagues:
Alex Noort: colleagues
Willem F. Bronsvoort: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: