ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Geometric constraint solver using multivariate rational spline functions
Full text PdfPdf (783 KB)
Source ACM Symposium on Solid and Physical Modeling archive
Proceedings of the sixth ACM symposium on Solid modeling and applications table of contents
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Pages: 1 - 10  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:1-58113-366-9
Authors
Gershon Elber  Department of Computer Science, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel
Myung-Soo Kim  School of Computer Science and Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea
Sponsor
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 37,   Citation Count: 22
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/376957.376958
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We present a new approach to building a solver for a set of geometric constraints represented by multivariate rational functions. The constraints are formulated using inequalities as well as equalities. When the solution set has dimension larger than zero, we approximate it by fitting a hypersurface to discrete solution points. We also consider a variety of constraint solving problems common in geometric modeling. These include computing ray-traps, bisectors, sweep envelopes, and regions accessible during 5-axis machining.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
K. Abdel-Malek and H.-J. Yeh. Geometric representation of the swept volume using Jacobian rank-deficiency conditions. Computer-Aided Design, Vol 29, pp 457--468, 1997.
 
2
 
3
G. Elber and E. Cohen. A unified approach to verification in 5- axis freeform milling environments. Computer-Aided Design, Vol 31, No 13, pp 795-804, November 1999.
4
 
5
 
6
G. Elber and M.-S. Kim. A computational model for nonrational bisector surfaces: curve-surface and surface-surface bisectors. Proc. of Geometric Modeling and Processing 2000, Hong Kong, pp 364-372, April 10-12, 2000.
 
7
 
8
 
9
G. H. Golub and C. E Van Loan. Matrix Computation. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London, Third Edition, 1996.
 
10
H.-S. Heo, M.-S. Kim, and G. Elber. The intersection of two ruled surfaces. Computer-Aided Design, Vol 31, No 1, pp 33- 50, January 1999.
 
11
 
12
IRIT 8.0 User's Manual, September 2000, Technion. www.cs.technion,ac.il/irit.
 
13
 
14
J. Lane and R. Riesenfeld. Bounds on a polynomial. BIT, Vol 21, pp 112-117, 1981.
15
 
16
D. G. Luenberger. Linear and Nonlinear Programming. Second Edition, Addison-Wesley, Menlo Park, California, 1984.
 
17
18
 
19
S. Tabachnikov. Billiards. Paris: Societe Mathematique de France, 1995.
 
20
 
21
T. W. Sederberg and A. K. Zundel. Pyramids that bound purface patches. Graphical Models and Image Processing, Vol 58, No 1, pp 75-81, 1996.
 
22
 
23
D. Wells. The Penguin Dictionary of Curious and Interesting Geometry Penguin Books, New York, 1991.

CITED BY  24
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Collaborative Colleagues:
Gershon Elber: colleagues
Myung-Soo Kim: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: