ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
ALGOL 60 confidential
Full text PdfPdf (650 KB)
Source
Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 4 ,  Issue 6  (June 1961) table of contents
Pages: 268 - 272  
Year of Publication: 1961
ISSN:0001-0782
Authors
Donald E. Knuth  California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Jack N. Merner  Burroughs Corp., Pasadena, CA
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 37,   Citation Count: 7
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/366573.366599
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The ALGOL 60 Report,* when first encountered, seems to describe a very complex language which will be difficult to learn. The “metalinguistic formulae” admirably serve the purpose of precisely specifying a language, but they are certainly not very readable for a beginner. However, experience has shown that once the report is explained it is in fact easy to learn ALGOL and to write algorithms in it. The language is so general and powerful it can handle an enormous class of problems. It is not hard to learn those parts of ALGOL present in other compiler languages: how to write assignment and go to and for statements, etc. Indeed, a lot of the unnecessary restrictions imposed by other compiling languages have finally been lifted. But ALGOL also allows many unobvious things to be written, as we will see later, and herein lies a problem: ALGOL seems to have become too general. So many restrictions have been lifted that a lot of technical details crop up which are hard to learn and to use correctly. In this paper some of the more obscure features of the language are considered and their usefulness is discussed. Remarks are based on the authors' interpretations of the ALGOL 60 Report.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
NAUR, PETER. A Manual of the DASK ALGOL Language. Regnecentralen, Copenhagen, November 1960.
3
 
4
NAUR, PETER. Letter to the Editor, Comm. ACM 4 (Feb. 1961), A16-A17.
5
6
 
7
THATCHER, HENRY C., JR. Letter to Algol Maintenance Subcommittee, October 21, 1960.
 
8
DAWS, MARTEN. Computability and Unsolvability. McGraw- Hill, 1958.
 
9
INGERMAN, PETER ZILAHY. Memorandum to ALGOL Working Group, March 6, 1961.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Donald E. Knuth: colleagues
Jack N. Merner: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: