Distance, dependencies, and delay in a global collaboration

ABSTRACT

Collaborations over distance must contend with the loss of the rich, subtle interactions that co-located teams use to coordinate their work. Previous research has suggested that one consequence of this loss is that cross-site work will take longer than comparable single-site work. We use both survey data and data from the change management system to measure the extent of delay in a multi-site software development organization. We also measure site interdependence, differences in same-site and cross-site communication patterns, and analyze the relationship of these variables to delay. Our results show a significant relationship between delay in cross-site work and the degree to which remote colleagues are perceived to help out when workloads are heavy. This result is particularly troubling in light of the finding that workers generally believed they were as helpful to their remote colleagues as to their local colleagues. We discuss implications of our findings for collaboration technology for distributed organizations.

REFERENCES

• 1: Mark J. Abel, Experiences in an exploratory distributed organization, Intellectual teamwork: social and technological foundations of cooperative work, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ, 1990
• 2: Mark S. Ackerman , Christine Halverson, Considering an organization's memory, Proceedings of the 1998 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, p.39-48, November 14-18, 1998, Seattle, Washington, United States [doi>10.1145/289444.289461]
• 3: Allen T.J.,Managing the Flow of Technology.1977, Cambridge,MA:MIT Press.
• 4: Victoria Bellotti , Sara Bly, Walking away from the desktop computer: distributed collaboration and mobility in a product design team, Proceedings of the 1996 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, p.209-218, November 16-20, 1996, Boston, Massachusetts, United States [doi>10.1145/240080.240256]
• 5: Boyer,D.G.,et al.Virtual Community Presence Awareness.In CSCW '98 Workshop on Designing Virtual Communities for Work.1999.Seattle,WA.
• 6: Cadiz,J.J.,et al.,The Awareness Monitor:A Coordination Tool for Asynchronous Distributed Work Teams.Unpublished manuscript.Carnegie Mellon University,1999.
• 7: Elizabeth F. Churchill , Sara Bly, It's all in the words: supporting work activites with lightweight tools, Proceedings of the international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work, p.40-49, November 14-17, 1999, Phoenix, Arizona, United States [doi>10.1145/320297.320302]
• 8: Cusumano,M.A.and D.B.Yoffie,Competing on Internet Time.1998,New York NY:The Free Press.
• 9: Paul Dourish , Sara Bly, Portholes: supporting awareness in a distributed work group, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.541-547, May 03-07, 1992, Monterey, California, United States [doi>10.1145/142750.142982]
• 10: Stephen G. Eick , Todd L. Graves , Alan F. Karr , J. S. Marron , Audris Mockus, Does Code Decay? Assessing the Evidence from Change Management Data, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.27 n.1, p.1-12, January 2001 [doi>10.1109/32.895984]
• 11: Robert S. Fish , Robert E. Kraut , Robert W. Root , Ronald E. Rice, Evaluating video as a technology for informal communication, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.37-48, May 03-07, 1992, Monterey, California, United States [doi>10.1145/142750.142755]
• 12: Susan R. Fussell , Robert E. Kraut , F. Javier Lerch , William L. Scherlis , Matthew M. McNally , Jonathan J. Cadiz, Coordination, overload and team performance: effects of team communication strategies, Proceedings of the 1998 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, p.275-284, November 14-18, 1998, Seattle, Washington, United States [doi>10.1145/289444.289502]
• 13: Galbraith,J.,Organizational Design.1977,Reading MA:Addison-Wesley.
• 14: Rebecca E. Grinter, Recomposition: putting it all back together again, Proceedings of the 1998 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, p.393-402, November 14-18, 1998, Seattle, Washington, United States [doi>10.1145/289444.289514]
• 15: Rebecca E. Grinter , James D. Herbsleb , Dewayne E. Perry, The geography of coordination: dealing with distance in R&D work, Proceedings of the international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work, p.306-315, November 14-17, 1999, Phoenix, Arizona, United States [doi>10.1145/320297.320333]
• 16: Heath,C.and P.Luff.Collaborative Activity and Technological Design:Task Coordination in London Underground Control Rooms.In ECSCW '91.1991. Amsterdam 65-80.
• 17: James D. Herbsleb , Rebecca E. Grinter, Splitting the organization and integrating the code: Conway's law revisited, Proceedings of the 21st international conference on Software engineering, p.85-95, May 16-22, 1999, Los Angeles, California, United States [doi>10.1145/302405.302455]
• 18: Debby Hindus , Mark S. Ackerman , Scott Mainwaring , Brian Starr, Thunderwire: a field study of an audio-only media space, Proceedings of the 1996 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, p.238-247, November 16-20, 1996, Boston, Massachusetts, United States [doi>10.1145/240080.240262]
• 19: Hughes,J.A.D.Randall,and D.Shapiro.From Ethnographic Record to System Design:Some Experiences from the Field.Computer Supported Cooperative Work:An International Journal 1,3,1993, 123-141.
• 20: Robert E. Kraut , Carmen Egido , Jolene Galegher, Patterns of contact and communication in scientific research collaborations, Intellectual teamwork: social and technological foundations of cooperative work, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ, 1990
• 21: Robert E. Kraut , Lynn A. Streeter, Coordination in software development, Communications of the ACM, v.38 n.3, p.69-81, March 1995 [doi>10.1145/203330.203345]
• 22: Mockus,A.,et al.,On Measurement and Analysis of Software Changes.Bell Labs Technical Report No. BL0113590-990401-06TM,Murray Hill,NJ,
• 23: Akihiko Obata , Kazuo Sasaki, OfficeWalker: a virtual visiting system based on proxemics, Proceedings of the 1998 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, p.1-10, November 14-18, 1998, Seattle, Washington, United States [doi>10.1145/289444.289449]
• 24: Olson G.M.and J.S.Olson.Distance Matters.Human- Computer Interaction,in press.
• 25: Judith S. Olson , Stephanie Teasley, Groupware in the wild: lessons learned from a year of virtual collocation, Proceedings of the 1996 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, p.419-427, November 16-20, 1996, Boston, Massachusetts, United States [doi>10.1145/240080.240353]
• 26: Leysia Palen, Social, individual and technological issues for groupware calendar systems, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: the CHI is the limit, p.17-24, May 15-20, 1999, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States [doi>10.1145/302979.302982]
• 27: Robertson,T.Cooperative Work and Lived Cognition: A Taxonomy of Embodied Interaction.In Fifth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work ECSCW '97.1997.Lancaster,UK: Dordrecht,Netherlands:Kluwer Academic Publishers 205-220.
• 28: Slatalla,M.,The office meeting that never ends.New York Times,Sept.23,1999.
• 29: Lucy A. Suchman, Office procedure as practical action: models of work and system design, ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), v.1 n.4, p.320-328, Oct. 1983 [doi>10.1145/357442.357445]
• 30: Hilda Tellioğlu , Ina Wagner, Negotiating Boundaries. Configuration Management in Software DevelopmentTeams, Computer Supported Cooperative Work, v.6 n.4, p.251-274, 1997 [doi>10.1023/A:1008686916910]

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.3 Group and Organization Interfaces
          Subjects: Collaborative computing

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.4 INFORMATION SYSTEMS APPLICATIONS

  K. Computing Milieux
  K.6 MANAGEMENT OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS
      K.6.3 Software Management
          Subjects: Software development

General Terms:
Design, Management, Measurement, Performance, Theory

Keywords:
awareness, delay, global collaboration, informal communication, interdependence, software development, speed