Configuration agents, control and privacy

ABSTRACT

When a truly diverse community of users is considered, it is clear that a single interface, no matter how well designed, cannot accommodate everyone. Configuring an interface to match a particular user's requirements can be a demanding task. This paper focuses on the potential utility of configuration agents to support users with low initial levels of control, or low levels of knowledge about configuration. The relationship between configuration of systems by agents, user control, and user privacy is discussed. It is argued that privacy issues are of primary importance, and suggestions are made for ways to apply agent technologies to the configuration problem without compromising user control and privacy. Work in progress to inform and further develop these issues is described.

REFERENCES

• 1: Alliance for Technology Access, The Computer and Web Resources for People with Disabilities, 3rd Edition (2000), Hunter House Inc., ISBN 0-89793-300-1.
• 2: Benyon, D. and Murray, D. Adaptive systems: From intelligent tutoring to autonomous agents. Knowledgebased Systems 6, 4 (1993), 197-219.
• 3: Carl Brown, Assistive technology computers and persons with disabilities, Communications of the ACM, v.35 n.5, p.36-45, May 1992 [doi>10.1145/129875.129877]
• 4: Cavoukian, A. Privacy and Biometrics, in Proceedings of the 21" International Conference on Privacy and Personal Data Protection (September 1999). Available at: http://www.pco.org.hk/conproceed.html.
• 5: Cranor, L. Agents of choice: Tools that facilitate notice and choice about web site data practices, in Proceedings of the 21 st International Conference on Privacy and Personal Data Protection (Sept 1999). Available at: http://www.pco.org.hk/conproceed.html.
• 6: Dieterich, H., Malinowski, U., Kiihme, T. and Schneider-Hufschmidt, M. State of the art in adaptive user interfaces, in Schneider-Hufschmidt, M., Kiihme, T. and Malinowski, U. (eds) Adaptive User Interfaces: Principles and Practice. Volume 10, Human Factors in Information Technology (1993), Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, 13-48.
• 7: Josef Fink , Alfred Kobsa , Jörg Schreck, Personalized Hypermedia Information Provision Through Adaptive and Adaptable System Features: User Modelling, Privacy and Security Issues, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Intelligence and Services in Networks: Technology for Cooperative Competition, p.459-467, May 27-29, 1997
• 8: Horvitz, E. Uncertainty, action and interaction: In pursuit of mixed-initiative computing. Intelligent Systems (September/October 1999), IEEE Computer Society, 17-20.
• 9: Horvitz, E., Breese, J., Heckerman, D., Hovel, D. and Rommelse, K.. The Lumiere Project: Bayesian User Modeling for Inferring the Goals and Needs of Software Users. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (July 1998).
• 10: Jameson, A. Numerical uncertainty management in user and student modeling: An overview of systems and issues. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 5 (1996), 193-251.
• 11: Kiihme, T. User-centered approach to adaptive interfaces. Knowledge-based Systems 6, 4 (1993), 239- 248.
• 12: Pattie Maes, Agents that reduce work and information overload, Communications of the ACM, v.37 n.7, p.30-40, July 1994 [doi>10.1145/176789.176792]
• 13: Maskery, H. Adaptive interfaces for na'fve users -An experimental study, in Shackel, B. (ed) Proceedings of Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT 84 (1985), Elsevier Science Publishers (North-Holland), 343-349.
• 14: Meyer, B. Adaptive performance support: User acceptance of a self-adapting system, in Fourth International Conference on User Modeling: Proceedings of the Conference (August 1994), MITRE Corporation, 65-70.
• 15: Mitchell, A. (2000) Too Close for Comfort: By Selling On Personal Information About Their Web Usage Data Marketers Are Abusing Their Customers. New Media Age, March 9, 2000 / 24. Centaur Publishing Ltd.
• 16: Morris, N., Rouse, W. and Ward, S. Studies of dynamic task allocation in an aerial search environment. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 18, 2 (1988), 376-389.
• 17: Nisbet, P. and Poon, P. Special Access Technology. (1998), CALL Centre, University of Edinburgh, Scotland. ISBN 1 898042 11 X.
• 18: Donald A. Norman, How might people interact with agents, Communications of the ACM, v.37 n.7, p.68-71, July 1994 [doi>10.1145/176789.176796]
• 19: OECD (1980) Guidelines on the Protection of Privacy and Transborder Flows of Personal Data. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/dsti/sti/it/secur/prod/PRIV- EN.HTM
• 20: Poulson, D., Ashby, M. and Richardson, S. Userfit: A practical handbook on user-centered design for Assistive Technology. (1996), TIDE 1062 USER Project, European Commission, Brussels-Luxembourg.
• 21: Thomas C. Rindfleisch, Privacy, information technology, and health care, Communications of the ACM, v.40 n.8, p.92-100, Aug. 1997 [doi>10.1145/257874.257896]
• 22: Ben Shneiderman , Pattie Maes, Direct manipulation vs. interface agents, interactions, v.4 n.6, p.42-61, Nov./Dec. 1997 [doi>10.1145/267505.267514]
• 23: Janice C. Sipior , Burke T. Ward, The ethical and legal quandary of email privacy, Communications of the ACM, v.38 n.12, p.48-54, Dec. 1995 [doi>10.1145/219663.219679]
• 24: Constantine Stephanidis , Alex Paramythis , Michael Sfyrakis , A. Stergiou , N. Maou , A. Leventis , G. Paparoulis , Charalampos Karagiannidis, Adaptable and Adaptive User Interfaces for Disabled Users in the AVANTI Project, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Intelligence and Services in Networks: Technology for Ubiquitous Telecom Services, p.153-166, May 25-28, 1998
• 25: Thomas, R. E. & Maurer, V. G. (1997) Database marketing practice: Protecting consumer privacy. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 16(1) pp 147- 155.
• 26: Shari Trewin , Helen Pain, A Study of Two Keyboard Aids to Accessibility, Proceedings of HCI on People and Computers XIII, p.83-97, January 1998
• 27: Shari Trewin , Helen Pain, Keyboard and mouse errors due to motor disabilities, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, v.50 n.2, p.109-144, Feb. 1999 [doi>10.1006/ijhc.1998.0238]
• 28: Trewin, S. and Pain, H. A model of keyboard configuration requirements. Behaviour and Information Technology Special issue on Assistive Technologies for People with Disabilities 18, 1 (1999), 27-35.
• 29: Woodward, J. Biometrics: Privacy's foe or privacy's friend? Proceedings of the IEEE 85, 9 (September 1997), 1480-1492.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)

Additional Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
      D.2.2 Design Tools and Techniques
          Subjects: User interfaces

  H. Information Systems
  H.1 MODELS AND PRINCIPLES

  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.2 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

  K. Computing Milieux
  K.4 COMPUTERS AND SOCIETY
      K.4.1 Public Policy Issues
          Subjects: Privacy
      K.4.2 Social Issues
          Subjects: Assistive technologies for persons with disabilities
  K.6 MANAGEMENT OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS

General Terms:
Design, Human Factors, Management, Performance, Security, Theory

Keywords:
configuration, interface agents, privacy, universal usability, user interface design, users with disabilities