Effects of annotations on student readers and writers

ABSTRACT

Recent research on annotations has focused on how readers annotate texts, ignoring the question of how reading annotations might affect subsequent readers of a text. This paper reports on a study of persuasive essays written by 123 undergraduates receiving primary source materials annotated in various ways. Findings indicate that annotations improve Findings indicate that annotations improve recall of emphasized items, influence how specific arguments in the source materials are perceived, decrease students' tendencies to unnecessarily summarize. Of particular interest is that students' perceptions of the annotator appeared to greatly influence how they responded to the annotated material. Using this study as a basis, I discuss implications for the design and implementation of digitally annotated materials.

REFERENCES

• 1: B. Benjamin, G. Siesing, J. Slaughter, A. Osborn, and J. Wenzel, "Critical Tools: What is the Annotator Tool?," http://www.cwrl.utexas.edu/~criticaltools/docum entation/annotator/rationale.html, 1999.
• 2: B.H. Bretzing and R. W. Kulhavy, "Note- Taking and Passage Style," Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 73, pp. 242-250, 1981.
• 3: V.M. Cashen and K. L. Leicht, "Role of the Isolation effect in a Formal Educational Setting," Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 61, pp. 484-486, 1970.
• 4: J.H. Crouse and P. Idstein, "Effects of Encoding Cues on Prose Learning," Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 63, pp. 309-313, 1972.
• 5: L. Flower, "Writer-Based Prose: A Cognitive Basis for Problems in Writing," College English vol. 41, pp. 19-37, 1979.
• 6: L. Flower, V. Stein, J. Ackerman, M. J. Kantz, K. McCormick, and W. C. Peck, Reading-to- Write: Exploring a Cognitive and Social Process. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.
• 7: R.L. Fowler and A. S. Barker, "Effectiveness oJ Highlighting for Retention of Text Material," Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 59, pp. 358- 364, 1974.
• 8: L. Higgins, "Reading to Argue: Helping Students Transform Source Texts," in Hearing ourselves think: cognitive research in the colleg writing classroom, A. M. Penrose and B. M. Sitko, Eds. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993, pp. 70-101.
• 9: M.L. Kennedy, "The composing process of college students writing from sources," WC, vol 2, pp. 434-56, 1985.
• 10: A.A. Lunsford and J. J. Ruszkiewicz, The Presence of Others, Second Edition ed. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1997.
• 11: Catherine C. Marshall, Annotation: from paper books to the digital library, Proceedings of the second ACM international conference on Digital libraries, p.131-140, July 23-26, 1997, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States [doi>10.1145/263690.263806]
• 12: Catherine C. Marshall, Toward an ecology of hypertext annotation, Proceedings of the ninth ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia : links, objects, time and space---structure in hypermedia systems: links, objects, time and space---structure in hypermedia systems, p.40-49, June 20-24, 1998, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States [doi>10.1145/276627.276632]
• 13: Catherine C. Marshall , Morgan N. Price , Gene Golovchinsky , Bill N. Schilit, Introducing a digital library reading appliance into a reading group, Proceedings of the fourth ACM conference on Digital libraries, p.77-84, August 11-14, 1999, Berkeley, California, United States [doi>10.1145/313238.313262]
• 14: Kenton O'Hara , Abigail Sellen, A comparison of reading paper and on-line documents, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.335-342, March 22-27, 1997, Atlanta, Georgia, United States [doi>10.1145/258549.258787]
• 15: Kenton O'Hara , Fiona Smith , William Newman , Abigail Sellen, Student readers' use of library documents: implications for library technologies, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.233-240, April 18-23, 1998, Los Angeles, California, United States [doi>10.1145/274644.274678]
• 16: Ilia A. Ovsiannikov , Michael A. Arbib , Thomas H. McNeill, Annotation technology, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, v.50 n.4, p.329-362, April 1999 [doi>10.1006/ijhc.1999.0247]
• 17: A.M. Penrose and C. Geisler, "Reading and Writing Without Authority," College Composition and Communication, vol. 45, pp. 505-520, 1994.
• 18: Morgan N. Price , Gene Golovchinsky , Bill N. Schilit, Linking by inking: trailblazing in a paper-like hypertext, Proceedings of the ninth ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia : links, objects, time and space---structure in hypermedia systems: links, objects, time and space---structure in hypermedia systems, p.30-39, June 20-24, 1998, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States [doi>10.1145/276627.276631]
• 19: K.A. Schriver, "Teaching writers to anticipate readers' needs: A classroom-evaluated pedagogy," Written Communication, vol. 9, pp. 179-208, 1992.
• 20: G.M. Schumacher and J. G. Nash, "Conceptualizing and Measuring Knowledge Change Due to Writing," Research in the Teaching ofEnglish, vol. 25, pp. 67-96, 1991.
• 21: H. van Oostendorp, "Studying and Annotating Electronic Text," in Hypertext and Cognition, J. Rouet, J. J. Levonen, A. Dillon, R. J. Spiro, Eds. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1996, pp. 137-147.
• 22: Lynn D. Wilcox , Bill N. Schilit , Nitin Sawhney, Dynomite: a dynamically organized ink and audio notebook, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.186-193, March 22-27, 1997, Atlanta, Georgia, United States [doi>10.1145/258549.258700]

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.1 MODELS AND PRINCIPLES

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.3 INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL

General Terms:
Design, Documentation, Human Factors, Management, Measurement, Performance, Theory

Keywords:
annotation, annotation systems design, composition instruction, note-making, paper, reading