Is paper safer? The role of paper flight strips in air traffic control

ABSTRACT

Air traffic control is a complex, safety-critical activity, with well-established and successful work practices. Yet many attempts to automate the existing system have failed because controllers remain attached to a key work artifact: the paper flight strip. This article describes a four-month intensive study of a team of Paris en-route controllers in order to understand their use of paper flight strips. The article also describes a comparison study of eight different control rooms in France and the Netherlands. Our observations have convinced us that we do not know enough to simply get rid of paper strips, nor can we easily replace the physical interaction between controllers and paper strips.These observationshighlight the benefits of strips, including qualities difficult to quantify and replicate in new computer systems. Current thinking offers two basic alternatives: maintaining the existing strips without computer support and bearing the financial cost of limiting the air traffic, or replacing the strips with automated versions, which offer potential benefits in terms of increased efficiency through automation, but unknown risks through radical change of work practices. We conclude with a suggestion for a third alternative: to maintain the physical strips, but turn them into the interface to the computer. This would allow controllers to build directly upon their existing, safe work practices with paper strips, while offering them a gradual path for incorporating new computer-based functions. Augmented paper flight strips allow us to take advantage of uniquely human skills in the physical world, and allows us to leave the user interface and its subsequent evolution in the hands of the people most responsible, the air traffic controllers themselves.

REFERENCES

• 1: AMALDI, P. 1993. RADAR controller's problem-solving and decision-making skills. In Verification and Validation of Complex Systems: Additional Human Factors Issues Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University.
• 2: Ravin Balakrishnan , George Fitzmaurice , Gordon Kurtenbach , William Buxton, Digital tape drawing, Proceedings of the 12th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, p.161-169, November 07-10, 1999, Asheville, North Carolina, United States [doi>10.1145/320719.322598]
• 3: R. Bentley , J. A. Hughes , D. Randall , T. Rodden , P. Sawyer , D. Shapiro , I. Sommerville, Ethnographically-informed systems design for air traffic control, Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work, p.123-129, November 01-04, 1992, Toronto, Ontario, Canada [doi>10.1145/143457.143470]
• 4: Eric A. Bier , Maureen C. Stone , Ken Pier , William Buxton , Tony D. DeRose, Toolglass and magic lenses: the see-through interface, Proceedings of the 20th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, p.73-80, September 1993 [doi>10.1145/166117.166126]
• 5: BRESSOLLE, M. C., PAVARD, B., AND LEROUX, M. 1995. The role of multimodal communication in cooperative and intention recognition. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Cooperative and Mulimodal Communication: Theory and Applications (MCM '95, Eindhoven, The Netherlands),
• 6: W. Buxton , B. Myers, A study in two-handed input, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.321-326, April 13-17, 1986, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
• 7: Stéphane Chatty , Patrick Lecoanet, Pen computing for air traffic control, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: common ground, p.87-94, April 13-18, 1996, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada [doi>10.1145/238386.238436]
• 8: DERTOUZOUS, M. 1990. Computers and Productivity. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
• 9: Mark B. Edwards , Carol A. Manning , Dana K. Fuller , O. U. Vortac, The role of flight progress strips in en route air traffic control: a time-series analysis, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, v.43 n.1, p.1-13, July 1995 [doi>10.1006/ijhc.1995.1033]
• 10: ENDSLEY, M. R. 1988. Design and evaluation for situation awareness enhancement. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 32nd Annual Meeting, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Inc., Santa Monica, CA, 97-101.
• 11: GIBBS, W. 1998. The re-invention of paper. Sci. Am. 279, 9 (Sept.).
• 12: GIBSON, J. 1986. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc. Inc., Hillsdale, NJ.
• 13: GRAS, A., MORICOT, C., POIROT-DELPECH, S. L., AND SCARDIGLI, V. 1994. Faced with Automation: The Pilot, the Controller, and the Engineer. Publications of the Sorbonne, Paris, France.
• 14: GUIARD, Y. 1987. Asymmetric division of labor in human skilled bimanual action: The kinematic chain as a model. J. Motor Behav. 19, 4, 486-517.
• 15: R. R. Harper , J. A. Hughes , D. Z. Shapiro, Harmonious working and CSCW: computer technology and air traffic control, Studies in computer supported cooperative work: theory, practice and design, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1990
• 16: HEATH, C. AND LUFF, P. 1991. Collaborative activity and technological design: Task coordination in London underground control rooms. In Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW '91, Sept. 25-27), L. Bannon, M. Robinson, and K. Schmidt, Eds. Kluwer B.V., Deventer, The Netherlands.
• 17: HOPKIN, V. D. 1993. Human factors implications of air traffic control automation. In Proceedings of the 5th International on Human Computer Interaction (HCI '93, Orlando, FL), 145-150.
• 18: HOPKIN, V. D. 1995. Human Factors in Air Traffic Control. Taylor and Francis, Inc., Bristol, PA.
• 19: John A. Hughes , David Randall , Dan Shapiro, Faltering from ethnography to design, Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work, p.115-122, November 01-04, 1992, Toronto, Ontario, Canada [doi>10.1145/143457.143469]
• 20: KAHNEMAN, D., SLOVIC, P., AND TVERSKY, A. 1982. A Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
• 21: Thomas K. Landauer, The trouble with computers, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995
• 22: LEROUX, M. 1993. The role of expert systems in future cooperative tools for air traffic controllers. In Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (Columbus, OH), 26-29.
• 23: Wendy E. Mackay, Augmented reality: linking real and virtual worlds: a new paradigm for interacting with computers, Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces, May 24-27, 1998, L'Aquila, Italy [doi>10.1145/948496.948498]
• 24: Wendy E. Mackay , Anne-Laure Fayard , Laurent Frobert , Lionel Médini, Reinventing the familiar: exploring an augmented reality design space for air traffic control, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.558-565, April 18-23, 1998, Los Angeles, California, United States [doi>10.1145/274644.274719]
• 25: NEGROPONTE, N. 1997. Surfaces and displays. Wired 4, I (Jan.), 212.
• 26: POIROT-DELPECH, S. 1995. Biographie du CAUTRA. Naissance et d veloppement d'un syst me d'informations pour la circulation a rienne. Ph.D. Dissertation. Universit de Paris I, Paris, France.
• 27: PREUX, F. 1994. R le des strips dans l'activit des contr leurs. S lection Professionnelle IEEAC. CENA.
• 28: REASON, J. 1990. Human Error. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
• 29: Lucy A. Suchman, Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 1987
• 30: VORTAC, O. AND GETTYS, C. 1990. Cognitive factors in the use of flight progress strips: Implications for automation. Cognitive Processes Laboratory, University of Oklahoma, OK.
• 31: Pierre Wellner , Wendy Mackay , Rich Gold, Back to the real world, Communications of the ACM, v.36 n.7, p.24-27, July 1993 [doi>10.1145/159544.159555]
• 32: ZOROLA-VILLARREAL, R., PAVARD, B., AND BASTIDE, R. 1995. SIM-COOP: A tool to analyse and predict cooperation in complex environments: A case study: The introduction of a datalink between controllers and pilots. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Human-Machine Interaction and Artificial Intelligence in Aerospace (IHM-AI-AS '95, Toulouse, France),
• 33: Shoshana Zuboff, In the age of the smart machine: the future of work and power, Basic Books, Inc., New York, NY, 1988

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.1 MODELS AND PRINCIPLES
      H.1.2 User/Machine Systems
          Subjects: Human factors

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)

  K. Computing Milieux
  K.4 COMPUTERS AND SOCIETY
      K.4.1 Public Policy Issues
          Subjects: Human safety

General Terms:
Human Factors, Theory

Keywords:
activity theory, affordances, air traffic control, annotation, ethnographic study, paper flight strips, peripheral awareness, safety factors