ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Subrecursive Programming Languages, Part I: efficiency and program structure
Full text PdfPdf (1.89 MB)
Source Journal of the ACM (JACM) archive
Volume 19 ,  Issue 3  (July 1972) table of contents
Pages: 526 - 568  
Year of Publication: 1972
ISSN:0004-5411
Authors
Robert L. Constable  Computer Science Department, Upson Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
Allan B. Borodin  Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto 181, Ontario, Canada
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 17,   Citation Count: 10
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/321707.321721
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
 
3
BLUM, M. On the size of machines. Inform. Contr. 11 (1967), 257-265.
 
4
BORODIN, A. Complexity classes of recursive functions and the existence of complexity gaps. Conf. Record of ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing, Marina del Rey, Calif., 1969, pp. 67-78.
 
5
CLEAVE, JOHN P. A hierarchy of primitive recursive functions. Z. Math. Logik Grund: lagen Math. 9 (1963), 331-345.
 
6
COBHAM, A. The intrinsic computational difficulty of functions. Proe. 1964 Internat. Congress for Logic, Methodology, and the Philosophy of Science. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1965, pp. 24-30.
 
7
8
9
 
10
ENGLER, ERWIN. Formal Languages; Automata and Structures. Markham Co., Chicago, 1968.
 
11
GRZEGORCZYK, A. Some classes of recursive functions. Rozprawy Mathematcyzne, No. 4, Instytut Matematyczny Polskiej Akademie Nauk, Warsaw, Poland, 1953, pp. 1-45.
 
12
HARTMANIS, Z., AND STEARNS, R.E. On the computational complexity of algorithms. Trans. AMS 117, 5 (1965), 285-306.
13
 
14
KLEENE, S.C. Introduction to Metamathematics. Van Nostrand, Princeton, N. J., 1952.
 
15
KNUTH, D., AND FLOYD, R. Notes on avoiding " go to" statements. Inform. Proc. Letters 1 (1971), 23-31.
 
16
LEwis, F. D. The enumerability and invariance of complexity classes. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 5 (1971), 286-303.
17
 
18
MEYER, A. R., AND FISCHER, P. C. On computational speed-up. IEEE Conf. Record, 9th Annual SWAT, 1968, pp. 351-355.
19
 
20
MEYER, A. R., AND RITCHIE, D. M. A classification of functions by computational complexity. Proc. Hawaii Intern. Conf. on System Sciences, U. of Hawaii Press, 1968, pp. 17-19.
 
21
 
22
RrrCHIE, R.W. Classes of predictably computable functions. Trans. AMS 106 (1963), 139-173.
 
23
ROBINSON, R.M. Primitive recursive functions. Bull. AMS 58 (1947), 915-942.
 
24
 
25
SCOTT, DANA. Some definitional suggestions for automata theory. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. I (1967), 187-212.
26
 
27

CITED BY  10

Collaborative Colleagues:
Robert L. Constable: colleagues
Allan B. Borodin: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: