ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Samplesort: A Sampling Approach to Minimal Storage Tree Sorting
Full text PdfPdf (703 KB)
Source Journal of the ACM (JACM) archive
Volume 17 ,  Issue 3  (July 1970) table of contents
Pages: 496 - 507  
Year of Publication: 1970
ISSN:0004-5411
Authors
W. D. Frazer  IBM Corporation, Department of Electrical Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, N.J and IBM Corporation, Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York
A. C. McKellar  Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn, Brooklyn, N.Y and Princeton University, Department of Electrical Engineering, Princeton, New Jersey
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 38,   Citation Count: 18
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/321592.321600
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The methods currently in use and previously proposed for the choice of a root in minimal storage tree sorting are in reality methods for making inefficient statistical estimates of the median of the sequence to be sorted. By making efficient use of the information in a random sample chosen during input of the sequence to be sorted, significant improvements over ordinary minimal storage tree sorting can be made. A procedure is proposed which is a generalization of minimal storage tree sorting and which has the following three properties: (a) There is a significant improvement (over ordinary minimal storage tree sorting) in the expected number of comparisons required to sort the input sequence. (b) The procedure is statistically insensitive to bias in the input sequence. (c) The expected number of comparisons required by the procedure approaches (slowly) the information-theoretic lower bound on the number of comparisons required. The procedure is, therefore, “asymptotically optimal.”


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
BELL, D.A. The principles of sorting. Computer J . 1, 1 (1958), 71-77.
2
3
4
5
 
6
HOARE, C. A.R. Quicksort. Computer J. 5 (1962), 10-15.
 
7
KNUTH, D .E . Personal communication.
 
8
MORRIS, R. Some theorems on sorting. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 17, 1 (Jan. 1969), 1-6.
9
 
10
SIEGEL, S. Nonparametric Statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1956. 11. WINDLEY, P .F . Trees, forests and rearranging. Computer J . 3, 2 (1960), 84-88.

CITED BY  18
 
 
 
 
 
 

Collaborative Colleagues:
W. D. Frazer: colleagues
A. C. McKellar: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: