ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Ambiguity in context free languages
Full text PdfPdf (2.18 MB)
Source Journal of the ACM (JACM) archive
Volume 13 ,  Issue 1  (January 1966) table of contents
Pages: 62 - 89  
Year of Publication: 1966
ISSN:0004-5411
Authors
Seymour Ginsburg  System Development Corporation, Santa Monica, California
Joseph Ullian  System Development Corporation, Santa Monica, California
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 44,   Citation Count: 11
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/321312.321318
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Four principal results about ambiguity in languages (i.e., context free languages) are proved. It is first shown that the problem of determining whether an arbitrary language is inherently ambiguous is recursively unsolvable. Then a decision procedure is presented for determining whether an arbitrary bounded grammar is ambiguous. Next, a necessary and sufficient algebraic condition is given for a bounded language to be inherently ambiguous. Finally, it is shown that no language contained in w1*w2*, each w1 a word, is inherently ambiguous.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
BAR-HILLEEL, PERLES, AND SHAMIR. On forraal properties of simple phrase structure grammars. Z. Phonetik. Sprachwiss. Kommunikationsforsch. 14 (1961), 143-172.
2
 
3
CoisKr, N. On certain formal properties of grammars. Inform. Control. 2 (1959), 137- 167.
 
4
Three models for the description of language. IRE Trans. on Information Theory 2 (1956), 113-124.
 
5
AND SCHUTZENBERGER, M. P. The algebraic theory of context-free languages. In Computer Programming and Formal Systems, Braffort and Hirschberg (Eds.), North- Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1963.
 
6
EVEY, J. The theory and applications of pushdown store machines. Mathematical Linguistics and Automatic Translation, Rep. No. NSF-10, Comput. Lab., Harvard U., 1963.
7
8
 
9
--- kND SpANIEI, E.H. Bounded ALGOL-like languages. Trans. Amer. Math. ocl 113 (1964), 333-368.
 
10
--- AND . Semigroups, Presburger formulas, and languages. Pacific J. Math., to appear.
 
11
GaIBACR, S.A. Inverses of phrase structure generators. Mathematical Linguistics and Automatic Translation, Rep. No. NSF-11, Comput. Lab., Harvard U., 1963.
 
12
PARIKH, R.. J. Language-generating devices. Quart. Prog. Rep. No. 60, Res. Lab. of Electronics, MIT, Jan. 1961, 199-212.
 
13
PosT, E.L. A variant of a recursively unsolvable problem. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 52 (1946), 264-268.
 
14
RABIN, M., AND SCOTT, D. Finite automata and their decision problems. IBM J. Res. Develop. 3 (1959), 114-125.
 
15
SCHINBRO, S. Note on the Boolean properties of contex free languages. Infor. ContrS (1960), 372-375.

CITED BY  11
 
 

Collaborative Colleagues:
Seymour Ginsburg: colleagues
Joseph Ullian: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: