ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Some tests of generalized bisection
Full text PdfPdf (1.81 MB)
Source ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS) archive
Volume 13 ,  Issue 3  (September 1987) table of contents
Pages: 197 - 220  
Year of Publication: 1987
ISSN:0098-3500
Author
R. Baker Kearfott  Univ. of Southwestern Louisiana, Lafayette
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 38,   Citation Count: 7
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/29380.29862
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper addresses the task of reliably finding approximations to all solutions to a system of nonlinear equations within a region defined by bounds on each of the individual coordinates. Various forms of generalized bisection were proposed some time ago for this task. This paper systematically compares such generalized bisection algorithms to themselves, to continuation methods, and to hybrid steepest descent/quasi-Newton methods. A specific algorithm containing novel “expansion” and “exclusion” steps is fully described, and the effectiveness of these steps is evaluated. A test problem consisting of a small, high-degree polynomial system that is appropriate for generalized bisection, but very difficult for continuation methods, is presented. This problem forms part of a set of 17 test problems from published literature on the methods being compared; this test set is fully described here.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
ALEFELD, G., AND HERZBERGER, J. Introduction to Interval Computations. Academic Press, New York, 1983.
 
2
ALEFELD, G., AND PLATZ0DER, L. A quadratically convergent Krawczyk-like algorithm. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 20, 1 (Feb. 1983), 210-219.
 
3
CRARY, F. The AUGMENT precompiler, Mathematics Research Center Rep. 1470, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, 1976.
 
4
DONGARRA, J.J. Performance of various computers using standard linear equations software in a Fortran environment. Mathematics and Computer Science Memo 23, Argonne National Lab., Argonne, Ill., 1985.
5
 
6
HANSEN, E.R. Interval forms of Newton's method. Computing 20 (1978), 153-163.
 
7
HANSEN, E.R. A globally convergent interval method for computing and bounding real roots. BIT 18, 4 (1978), 415-424.
 
8
HANSEN, E. R., AND GREENBERG, R.i. An interval Newton method. Appl. Math. Cornput. 12 (1983), 89-98.
 
9
HANSEN, E. R., AND SENGUPTA, S. Bounding solutions of systems of equations using interval arithmetic. BIT 21 (1981), 203-211.
 
10
KEARFOTT, R.B. On a general technique for finding directions proceeding from bifurcation points. In Numerical Methods for Bifurcation Problems. T. Kfipper, H. D. Mittelmann, and H. Weber, Eds, International Series of Numerical Mathematics 70, Birkh~iuser, Boston, 1984, 210-218.
 
11
KEARFOTT, R.B. Abstract generalized bisection and a cost bound. Math. Comput. 49, 179 (July 1987), 187-202.
 
12
 
13
MOORE, R.E. A test for existence of solutions to nonlinear systems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 14, 4 {Sept. 1977), 611-615.
 
14
 
15
MOORE, R. E., AND JONES, S.T. Safe starting regions for iterative methods. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 14, 6 (Dec. 1977), 1051-1065.
 
16
MOORE, R. E., AND QI, L. A successive interval test for nonlinear systems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 19, 4 (Aug. 1982), 845-850.
 
17
MOR~, J. J., GARBOW, B. S., AND HILLSTROM, K.E. User Guide for MINPACK-1. Rep. ANL- 80-74, Argonne National Labs., Argonne, Ill., 1980.
18
19
 
20
MORGAN, A.P. Solving Polynomial Systems Using Continuation {or Engineering and Scientific Problems, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1987.
21
 
22
NEUMAIER, A. Interval iteration for zeros of systems of equations, BIT 25, 1 (1985), 256-273.
 
23
 
24
TSAI, L. W., AND MORGAN, A.P. Solving the kinematics of the most general six- and fivedegree-of-freedom manipulators by continuation methods. Rep. GMR-4631, General Motors Research Labs., Warren, Mich., 1984. (To be published in the ASME J. Mechanisms, Transmissions, and Automation in Design.
25



Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: