ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Personality type, career preference and implications for computer science recruitment and teaching
Full text PdfPdf (1.16 MB)
Source ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 3 archive
Proceedings of the 3rd Australasian conference on Computer science education table of contents
The University of Queensland, Australia
Pages: 155 - 163  
Year of Publication: 1998
ISBN:1-58113-018-X
Author
Joy Teague  School of Management Information Systems, Waurn Ponds Campus, Deakin University, 3217
Sponsors
SIGCSE: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education
University of Queensland : University of Queensland
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 92,   Citation Count: 9
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/289393.289416
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
A.B. Tucker, Ed. Computing Curricula 1991: Report of the ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Curriculum TaskForce. ACM Press, 1991.
2
 
3
Department of Employment Education and Training Economic and Policy Analysis Division. Education and Training Needs of Computing Professionals and Paraprofessionals in Australia. Australian Government Publishing Service, 1990.
 
4
J. Gilbert. The best jobs in America. Money, Volume 23, Number 3, pages 70-74, 1994.
5
 
6
7
8
 
9
G.M. McCue. IBM's Santa Teresa laboratory m architectural design for program development. IBM Systems Journal, Volume 17, Number 1, pages 4-25, 1978.
 
10
 
11
F. Grundy. Women and Computers. intellect Books, 1996.
 
12
S. Kennedy. Why users hate ),our attitude. lnformatics, Volume February, pages 29-32, 1994.
 
13
C. Bishop-Clark. Cogrdtive style, persona/ity, and computer programming. Computers in Human Behavior, Volume 11, Nmber 2, pages 241-260, 1995.
 
14
P.B. Myers and IC D. Myers. MBT/Report Form.: Australian Council for Educational Research, 1988.
 
15
I.B. l%~yers and M. I-t. McCaulley. Manual: A guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc., 1985.
16
17
18
 
19
Otto Kroeger Associates. An MBTI~ Qualifying Programme. Otto Kroeger Associates, 2nd edition, 1985.
 
20
V.A. Clarke and G. J. Teague. Encouraging girls to study computer science m should we even try? Australian Educational Computing, Volume 9, Number 1, pages 17-22, 1994.
 
21
A. Craig. Women and business computing: Where to from here? GATES, Volume 4, Number 1, pages 13-19, 1997.
 
22
G.J. Ridgway. Computing/Mathematics at Deakin University, Geelong Campus. Deakin University., 1993.
 
23
G.J. Teague and V. A. Clarke. Fiction and fact: Students' and professionals' perceptions of women in computer science. In Women, Work and Computerization: Understanding and Overcoming Bias in Work and Education, I. V. Ericksson, B. A. Kitchenham, and K. (3. Tijdens, Eds., pages 363-375, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1991.
24
 
25
P. Booth and I-I. Winzar. Personality biases of accounting students: Some implications for learning style preferences. Journal of the Accounting Association of Australia and New Zealand, Volume 33, Number 2, pages 109- 120, 1993.

CITED BY  9
 
 


Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: