ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Performance evaluation of software architectures
Full text PdfPdf (2.42 MB)
Source Workshop on Software and Performance archive
Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on Software and performance table of contents
Santa Fe, New Mexico, United States
Pages: 164 - 177  
Year of Publication: 1998
ISBN:1-58113-060-0
Authors
Lloyd G. Williams  Software Engineering Research, 264 Ridgeview Lane, Boulder, Colorado
Connie U. Smith  Performance Engineering Services, PO Box 2640, Santa Fe, New Mexico
Sponsors
SIGMETRICS: ACM Special Interest Group on Measurement and Evaluation
SIGSOFT: ACM Special Interest Group on Software Engineering
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 161,   Citation Count: 23
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/287318.287353
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
 
3
 
4
H. Beilner, J. M#iter, and N. Weissenburg, "Towards a Performance Modeling Environment: News on HIT," Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Modeling Techniques and Tools for Computer Performance Evaluation, Plenum Publishing, 1988.
 
5
H. Beilner, J. M/iter, and C. Wysocki, "The Hierarchical Evaluation Tool HIT," in Performance Tools and Model Interchange Formats, F. Bause and H. Beilner, ed., Dortmund, Germany, Universit/it Dortmund, Fachbereich Informatik, 1995, pp. 6-9.
 
6
 
7
 
8
9
10
 
11
P. C. Clements, "Coming Attractions in Software Architecture," Technical Report No. CMU/SEI-96-TR-008, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, Jaunary, 1996.
 
12
P. C. Clements and L. M. Northrup, "Software Architecture: An Executive Overview," Technical Report No. CMU/SEI-96- TR-003, Software Engineering Institute, Camegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, February, 1996.
 
13
 
14
D. Garlan and M. Shaw, "An Introduction to Software Architecture," in Advances in Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, Volume 2, V. Ambriola and G. Yortora, ed., Singapore, World Scientific Publishing, 1993, pp. 1-39.
 
15
R. T. Goettge, "An Expert System for Performance Engineering of Time-Critical Software," Porceedings o{" the Computer Measurement Group Conference, Orlando, FL, 1990, pp. 313-320.
 
16
A. Grummitt, "A Performance Engineer's View of Systems Development and Trials," Proceedings of the Computer Measurement Group ConJbrence, Nashville, TN, 1991, pp. 455- 463.
 
17
 
18
ITU, "Criteria for the Use and Applicability of Formal Description Techniques, Message Sequence Chart (MSC)," International Telecommunication Union, 1996.
19
 
20
 
21
R. Kazman, M. Klein, M. Barbacci, T. Longstaff, H. Lipson, and J. Carriere, "The Architecture Tradeoff Analysis Method," Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 1997.
 
22
23
 
24
Rational Software Corporation, "Unified Modeling Language: Notation Guide, Version 1.1," Rational Software Corporation, Santa Clara, CA, September, 1997.
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
C. U. Smith and L. G. Williams, "Software Performance Engineering for Object-Oriented Systems: A Use Case Approach," submittedJbr publication, 1998.
 
29
 
30
 
31
M. Turner, D. Neuse, and R. Goldgar, "Simulating Optimizes Move to Client/Server Applications," Proceedings of the Computer Measurement Group Conference, Reno, NV, 1992, pp. 805-814.
 
32

CITED BY  23
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Collaborative Colleagues:
Lloyd G. Williams: colleagues
Connie U. Smith: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: