ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Using an alternative ethical paradigm for analysis: an example regarding e-mail privacy issues
Full text PdfPdf (520 KB)
Source ACM Policy archive
Proceedings of the ethics and social impact component on Shaping policy in the information age table of contents
Washington, D.C., United States
Pages: 52 - 55  
Year of Publication: 1998
ISBN:1-58113-038-4
Also published in ...
Author
D. Primeaux  Department of Mathematical Sciences, Virginia Commonwealth University
Sponsors
USACM : United States Association for Computational Mechanics
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
SIGCAS: ACM Special Interest Group on Computers and Society
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 32,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/276755.276776
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper suggests that a less-traditional ethical analysis of computer-based technological issues might be rewarded by unexpected and useful results. As an example, this paper offers an ethical analysis of e-mail privacy issues within the framework of ethical principles based on the work of Habermas.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
American Management Association Survey (AMA, 1997). Many major US firms check employee calls & e-mail or videotape workers on the job. Employee testing: Law and policy reporter, 23 May 1997.
 
2
R. N. Barger (1993). A metaethical analysis of computer ethics. Paper presented at the Second annual computer ethics institute conference, The Brookings Institute: Washington, DC.
 
3
O. Boyd-Barrett, and C. Newbold (eds.) (1995). Approaches to media. New York: Vintage Books.
 
4
B. S. Brennen, and D. Primeaux (1997). Public or private? E-mail and the ethics of privacy. Convergence, 3, 3, pp. 21-26.
 
5
Federal Guidelines for Searching and Seizing Computers (FGSSC, 1994). Criminal Law Reporter, 56, 12. Also found at http://www.intnet.net/pub/CRIME/ Fed.guide.search.seize.computers.
 
6
J. Habermas (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere (Translated by T. Burge). Cambridge: MIT Press.
 
7
J. Habermas (1990). Moral consciousness and communicative action (Translated by C. Lenhardt, and S. W. Nicholson). Cambridge: MIT Press.
 
8
C. E. M. G. Joad (1937) Guide to the philosophy of morals and politics. New York: Random House.
 
9
I. Kant (1929). Critique ofpure reason (Translated from the second edition {1787} by Norman Kemp Smith). London: Macmillan.
 
10
S. M. McMurrin (ed) (1987). Liberty, equality, and law. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
 
11
D. Primeaux, and B. S. Brennen (1997). Ethical considerations related to the accumulation and sale of data within the global communication community. Paper presented at the 47th annual conference, International Communication Association: Montreal.
 
12
J. Rawls (1987). The basic liberties and their priority. In McMurrin (1987), pp. 1-87.
 
13
J. B. Thompson (1993). The theory of the public sphere. Theory, culture and society, 10, 3, pp. 179-87, reprinted in Boyd-Barrett and Newbold (I995), pp. 252-59.


Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: