ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On multiple interpretations
Full text PdfPdf (1.33 MB)
Source ACM Symposium on Solid and Physical Modeling archive
Proceedings of the fourth ACM symposium on Solid modeling and applications table of contents
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Pages: 311 - 321  
Year of Publication: 1997
ISBN:0-89791-946-7
Author
JungHyun Han  National Institute of Standards and Technology, Manufacturing Systems Integration Division, Building 304, Room 12, Gaithersburg, MD
Sponsor
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 0,   Downloads (12 Months): 5,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/267734.267807
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
L. K. Kyprianou. Shape Classification in Computer Aided Design. PhD thesis, U. of Cambridge, 1980.
 
3
J. R. Corney. Graph-based Feature Recognition. PhD thesis, Iteriot-Watt Uni,~ersity, 1993.
 
4
 
5
Q. Ji and M. Marefat. Bayesian Approach for Extracting and Identifying Features. Computer Aided Design, 27(6):435-454, 1995.
 
6
D. Waco and Y. S. Kim. Geometric Reasoning for Machining Features using Convex Decomposition. Computer Aided Design, 26(6):477-489, 1994.
 
7
J. J. Shah, Y. Shen, and A. Shirur. Determination of machining volumes from extensible sets of design features. In J. J. Shah, M. Mgntyl/~, and D. S. Nau, editors, Advances in Feature Based Manufacturing, pages 129-157. Elsevier Science B. V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1994.
 
8
Y.-J. Tseng and S. B. Joshi. Recognizing Multiple Interpretations of interacting Machining Features. Computer Aided Design, 26(9):667-688, 1994.
 
9
H. Sakurai and P. Dave. Volume Decomposition and Feature Recognition, Part II: Curved Objects. Computer Aided Design, 28(6-7):519-537, 1996.
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
J. Han. Survey of Feature Research. Technical Report IRIS-96-346, Institute for Robotics and Intelligent Systems, University of Southern California, 1996.
 
14
M. MgntylS~, J. Opas, and J. Puhakka. Generative Process Planning of Prismatic Parts by Feature Relaxation. In ASME Advances in Design Automation, pages 49-60, 1989.
 
15
16
 
17
 
18
S. K. Gupta. Automated Manufacturability Analysis of Machined Parts. PhD thesis, University of Maryland, 1994.
 
19
S. K. Gupta and D. S. Nau. Systematic Approach to Analyzing the Manufacturability of Machined Parts. Computer Aided Design, 27(5):323-342, 1995.
 
20
 
21
J. Han and A. A. G. Requicha. Integration of Feature Based Design and Feature Recognition. In Proc. ASME Computers In Engineering Conference, pages 569-578, 1995.
 
22
j. Han and A. A. G. Requicha. Hint Generation and Completion for Feature Recognition. In Proc. International Symposium on Automotive Technology and Automation (ISATA), pages 89-96, 1996.
 
23
J. Hart and A. A. G. Requicha. Integration of Feature Based Design and Feature Recognition. Computer Aided Design, (to appear).
 
24
H. Sakurai. Volume Decomposition and Feature Recognition, Part I: Polyhedral Objects. Computer Aided Design, 27(11):833-843, 1995.
 
25



Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: