Achieving fluency in modernized and formalized Hohfeld

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

Achieving fluency in modernized and formalized Hohfeld: puzzles and games for the LEGAL RELATIONS Language

Full text

Pdf (1.20 MB)

Source

International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law archive
Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law table of contents

Melbourne, Australia

Pages: 19 - 28

Year of Publication: 1997

ISBN:0-89791-924-6

Authors

Layman E. Allen	University of Michigan
Charles S. Saxon	Eastern Michigan University

Sponsors

SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
IAAIL : Intl Asso for Artifical Intel & Law
UMIACS : U of MD Inst for Advanced Comp Studies
University of Melbourne : University of Melbourne

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 0, Downloads (12 Months): 20, Citation Count: 0

Additional Information:

references index terms collaborative colleagues peer to peer

Tools and Actions:	Request Permissions Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/261618.261623 What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Allen, Layman E. {1996} "From the Fundamental Legal Conceptions of Hohfeld to LEGAL RELATIONS: Refining the Enrichment of Solely Deontic LEGAL RELATIONS", pp. 1-26 in DEONTIC LOGIC, AGENCY AND NORMATIVE SYSTEMS, (Edited by Mark A. Brown and Jose CarinG), Springer and the British Computer Society, 1996. Presented at DEON '96: Third International Workshop on Deontic Logic in Computer Science, Sesimbra, Portugal, 11-13, January 1966. (Volume in the WORKSHOPS IN COMPUTING Series edited by C. J. van Rijsbergen).
	2	{1995} "Enriching the Deontie Fundamental Legal Conceptions of Hohfeld", Invited paper presented at the 25th Anniversary Celebration of the Norwegian Research Center for Computers and Law, March 15-17,1995, Oslo University, Oslo, Norway, to be published in Anniversary Anthology in Computers and Law, Edited by Jon Bing & O. Torvund, TANO-publ., Oslo.
	3	{1983} "Two Modes of Representing Sets of Legal Norms: Normalization and an Arithmetic Model", pp. 16.1 - 16.61. Proceedings of the Third International Congress of the Supreme Court of Italy Center for Electronic Documentation, JURIDICAL INFORMATICS AND THE NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY, Rome, May 9-14, 1983.
	4	{1982} "Towards a Normalized Language to Clarify the Structure of Legal discourse", Proceedings of International Study congress on LOGIC& INFO~TICA, DIRRETO, Florence, Italy, April 6-10, 1981. Published in DEONTIC LOGIC, COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS AND LEGAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS, pp. 349-407, Edited by Antonio A. Martino, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
	5	{1974} "Formalizing Hohfeldian Analysis to Clarify the Multiple Senses of'Legal Right': A Powerful Lens for the Electronic Age", 48 Southern California Law Review 428-487.
	6	{1968} "A Language-Normalization Approach to Information Retrieval in Law", 9 Jurimetrics Journal 1.
	7	{1961} WFF 'N PROOF: The Game of Modem Logic, Autotelie Instructional Materials Publishers, Turtle Creek, Pa.
	8	{1957} "Symbolic Logic: A Razor-Edged Tool for Drafting and Interpreting Legal Documents", 66 Yale Law Journal 833.
	9	Layman E. Allen , Charles S. Saxon, Better language, better thought, better communication: the A-Hohfeld language for legal analysis, Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.219-228, May 21-24, 1995, College Park, Maryland, United States [doi>10.1145/222092.222245]
	10	{1994} "Controlling Inadvertent Ambiguity in the Logical Structure of Legal Draining by Means of the Prescribed Definitions of the A..Hohfeld Structural Language", 9 THEORIA 135-172. Invited paper for the Conference in Celebration of the 25th Anniversary of the Istimto per la documentazione giuridica of the Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, TOWARD A GLOBAL EXPERT SYSTEM IN LAW: Selected Examples from Health and Environmental Law, Florence, italy, December 1-3, 1993.
	11	Layman E. Allen , Charles S. Saxon, A-Hohfeld: a language for robust structural representation of knowledge in the legal domain to build interpretation-assistance expert systems, Deontic logic in computer science: normative system specification, John Wiley and Sons Ltd., Chichester, UK, 1994
	12	Layman E. Allen , Charles S. Saxon, More IA needed in AI: interpretation assistance for coping with the problem of multiple structural interpretations, Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.53-61, May 1991, Oxford, England [doi>10.1145/112646.112652]
	13	Layman E. Allen , Charles S. Saxon, A-Hohfeld: a language for robust structural representation of knowledge in the legal domain to build interpretation-assistance expert systems, Deontic logic in computer science: normative system specification, John Wiley and Sons Ltd., Chichester, UK, 1994
	14	{1986} "Analysis of the Logical Structure of Legal Rules by a Modernized and Formalized Version of Hohfeld's Fundamental Legal conceptions", 385-450, in Automated Analysis of Legal Texts: Logic, Informatics, Law, Edited by Antonio A. Matting and Fiorenza $occi Natali, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
	15	Peter Gärdenfors , David Makinson, Nonmonotonic inference based on expectations, Artificial Intelligence, v.65 n.2, p.197-245, Feb. 1994 [doi>10.1016/0004-3702(94)90017-5]
	16	Thomas F. Gordon, Pleadings Game: An Artificial Intelligence Model of Procedural Justice, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA, 1995
	17	Thomas F. Gordon, The Pleadings Game: an exercise in computational dialectics, Artificial Intelligence and Law, v.2 n.4, p.239-292, 1993/1994 [doi>10.1007/BF00871972]
	18	Henning Herrestad , Christen Krogh, Obligations directed from bearers to counterparts, Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.210-218, May 21-24, 1995, College Park, Maryland, United States [doi>10.1145/222092.222243]
	19	Hohfeld, Wesley N. {1913} "Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning," 23 YALE L. J. 16 (1913). Reprinted with a New Foreword by Arthur L. Corbin by Yale University Press, London & New Haven (1964).
	20	Jones, Andrew J. I. & Sergot, Marik {1997} "A Formal Characterization of Institutional Power" (Forthcoming)
	21	Horty, John F. & Belnap, Nuel {1995} "The Deliberative STIT: S Study of Action, Omission, Ability, and Obligation, 24 J, OF PHILOSOPHICAL LOGIC 583-644.
	22	{1994} "Moral Dilemmas and Nonmonotonie Logic", 23 J. OF PHILOSPHICAL LOGIC 35-65 (1994).
	23	Loui, Ron {1997} "Alehouron and yon Wright on conflict among norms", in Defeasible Deontic Logic: Essays in Nonmonotonie Normative Reasoning (edited by Donald Nute), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Holland (in press).
	24	Henry Prakken, From logic to dialectics in legal argument, Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.165-174, May 21-24, 1995, College Park, Maryland, United States [doi>10.1145/222092.222230]
	25	Giovanni Sartor, The structure of norm conditions and nonmonotonic reasoning in law, Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.155-164, May 1991, Oxford, England [doi>10.1145/112646.112665]