A supplementary package for distance education students studying introductory programming

ABSTRACT

Teaching introductory programming can be a challenging task. Students can become too concerned with learning syntax at the expense of more general conceptual understanding. Distance education students in particular often have problems as the difficulty of the course content is compounded by the problems of isolation from other students and their tutor. Although instructional strategies for emphasising conceptual knowledge are well known for face-to-face instruction, there has been little attempt to apply them to the external situation. This paper describes a supplementary package for external students designed to address some of these problems. The package has been used for two semesters and feedback from students indicates that they find it a valuable resource.

REFERENCES

• 1: John R. Anderson , Brian J. Reiser, The LISP tutor: it approaches the effectiveness of a human tutor, BYTE, v.10 n.4, p.159-175, April 1985
• 2: Aveling, N., Smith'. S. & Wilson, C. (1992) Meeting the needs of isolated students: Is a technological fix the answer? In Parer. Ed. Academia Under Pressure." Theory and Practice {br the 21st Century, Research and Development in Higher Education, 15, Churchill Vic: HERDSA.
• 3: Dalbey, J. & Linn, M.C. (1985) The demands and requirements of computer programming. A review of the', literature. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1. 253-274.
• 4: Kurland, D.M., Pea, R.D., Clement, C. & Mawby, R. (1986) A study of the development of programming abilJLt3_T and thinking skills in high school students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2(4). 429-.458.
• 5: Marcia C. Linn , Michael J. Clancy, Can experts' explanations help students develop program design skills?, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, v.36 n.4, p.511-551, April 1992 [doi>10.1016/0020-7373(92)90095-3]
• 6: Linn. M.C. & Dalbey, j. (1985) Cognitive consequences of programming instruction Instruction, access, and ability. Educational P,~vchologist; 2(). 191-206.
• 7: Linn. M.C., Sloane, K. & Clancy, M.J. (i 987) Ideal and actual outcomes from precollege Pascal instnaction. Journal oJ'Research in Science Teaching. 24, 467-490.
• 8: Petre, M. (1990) Expert programmers and programming languages. In J.M. Hoc. T.R.G. Green. Samurcay, R. & D.J. Gilmore, Ed. Psychology o/'Programmmg. London:: Academic Press.
• 9: Schwartz. S., Perkins. D.N., Estey, G., KmidLenier~ J. & Simmons, R. (1989) A "metacourse" for BASIC: Assessiing a new model for enhancing instruction. Journal ~?f Educational Computing Research~ 5(3). 263-.297.
• 10: Patricia K. Schank , Marcia C. Linn , Michael J. Clancy, Supporting Pascal programming with an on-line template library and case studies, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, v.38 n.6, p.1031-1048, June 1993 [doi>10.1006/imms.1993.1048]
• 11: Soloway. E. & Ehrlich, K. (1984) Empirical studies of programming knowledge. IEEE Transactions on Sojkware Engineering, 10, 595-6(.)9
• 12: Volel, S.E. (199 t ) Modelling and coaching of relevant metacognitive strategies for enhancing university students' learning. Learning and Instruction. 1, 319-336.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.3 COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION
      K.3.1 Computer Uses in Education

General Terms:
Measurement, Theory