ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
PROP: a recursive paradigm for area-efficient and performance oriented partitioning of large FPGA netlists
Full text Publisher SitePublisher Site PdfPdf (389 KB)
Source International Conference on Computer Aided Design archive
Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE/ACM international conference on Computer-aided design table of contents
San Jose, California, United States
Pages: 644 - 649  
Year of Publication: 1995
ISBN:0-8186-7213-7
Authors
Roman Kužnar  Dept. of Electrical & Comp. Eng., University of Ljubljana, Tržžaška 25, 61000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Franc Brglez  CBL, Dept. of Electrical & Comp. Eng, Box 7911, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, N.C.
Sponsors
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
IEEE-CS : Computer Society
Publisher
IEEE Computer Society  Washington, DC, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 5,   Citation Count: 7
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we introduce a new recursive partitioning paradigm PROP which combines (p)artitioning, (r)eplication, (o)ptimization, to be followed by another recursion of (p)artitioning, etc. We measure the quality of partitions in terms of total device cost, logic and terminal utilization, and critical path delay. Traditionally, the minimum lower bound into which a given netlist can be partitioned is determined by disregarding the logic interconnect while distributing the logic nodes into a minimum number of devices. PROP paradigm challenges this assumption by demonstrating feasible partitions of some large netlists such that the number of device partitions is smaller than minimum lower bounds postulated initially. Overall, we report consistent reductions in the total number of partitions for a wide range of combinational and sequential circuit benchmarks while, on the average, reducing critical path delay as well.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
3
 
4
C. Kring and A. R. Newton. A Cell-Replicating Approach to Mincut- Based Circuit Partitioning. In IEEE ICCAD-91, pages 2-5, November 1991.
 
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
15
16
17
 
18
L. T. Liu, M. T. Kuo, C. K. Cheng, and T. C. Hu. Performance- Driven Partitioning using a Replication Graph Approach. In 32th DAC, ACM/IEEE, pages 206-210, June 1995.
 
19
20
 
21
R. Ku~nar. Latest Partitioning Results Update and Directories. Available from http://www.cbl.ncsu.edu/fcuznar/, August 1995. For an autoreply on up-to-date access to all benchmark directories, send e-mail to benchmarksOcbl.ncsu.edu.
 
22
S. Dey, F. Brglez, and G. Kedem. Circuit Partitioning for Logic Synthesis. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 26(3):350 - 363, March 1991.
 
23
Xilinx. User Guide and Tutorials. Xilinx Incorporation, 2100 Logic Drive, San Jose, California, 1991.
 
24
 
25
E. M. Sentovich et. al. SIS: A System for Sequential Circuit Synthesis. Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, 1992.

CITED BY  7
 

Collaborative Colleagues:
Roman Kužnar: colleagues
Franc Brglez: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: