ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Bootstrap methods in computer simulation experiments
Full text PdfPdf (618 KB)
Source Winter Simulation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 27th conference on Winter simulation table of contents
Arlington, Virginia, United States
Pages: 171 - 177  
Year of Publication: 1995
ISBN:0-7803-3018-8
Author
Russell C. H. Cheng  Institute of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Kent at Canterbury, Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NF, England
Sponsors
IIE : Institute of Industrial Engineers
SCS : Society for Computer Simulation
ASA : American Statistical Association
NIST : National Institue of Standards & Technology
IEEE-CS : Computer Society
IEEE-SMCS : Systems, Man & Cybernetics Society
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
INFORMS/CS : Computer Science TC
SIGSIM: ACM Special Interest Group on Simulation and Modeling
Publisher
IEEE Computer Society  Washington, DC, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 39,   Citation Count: 8
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/224401.224459
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We critically review the work that has been done in applying basic, smoothed and parametric bootstrap methods to simulation experiments. We develop a framework to classify bootstrap methods in this context and use it to compare various bootstrap schemes. Most bootstrap methods are hard to analyse theoretically. An exception is the parametric case for which a detailed analysis can be carried out. An interesting result in this case is that, whereas in standard statistical experiments bootstrap samples give only information about the variance of a statistic and not its mean, this turns out not to be so in simulation experiments. Thus parametric bootstrap samples can be advantageously included in estimates of the responses of interest.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Banks, D.L. 1989. Improving the Bayesian bootstrap. Unpublished paper. Dept of Pure Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics, Cambridge University.
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
Cheng, R.C.H. and Holland, W. 1995a. The effect of input parameters on the variability of simulation output. In Proceedings of UKSS'95, The Second Conference of the U.K. Simulation Society (ed. R.C.H. Cheng and R.J. Pooley), UK Simulation Society, EUCS Reprographics, Edinburgh Univ., 29- 36.
 
6
Cheng, R.C.H. and Holland, W. I995b. The sensitivity of computer simulation experiments to errors in input data. Accepted for SAMO95 International Symposium, Sept. 1995, Belgirate, Italy.
 
7
DiCiccio, T.J. and Romano, J.P. 1988. A review of bootstrap confidence intervals. J. R. Statist. ~ooc. B, 50, 338-354.
 
8
Efron, B. 1982. The jackknife, the bootstrap and other resampling plans. Volume 38 of CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics. SIAM.
 
9
Efron, B. and Tibshirani, R.J. 1993. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. New York and London: Chapman and Hall.
 
10
Hinkley D.J. 1988. Bootstrap methods. J. R. S~a~ist. Soc. B, 50, 321-337.
 
11
Kim, Y. B., Haddock, J. and Willemain, T. R. 1993a. The binary bootstrap: inference with correlated data. Commun. oCtatist.-Szmula., 22, 205-216.
12
 
13
 
14
Rubin, D.B. 1981. The Bayesian bootstrap. Ann. Statist. 9, 130-134.
 
15
Shiue, W.-K., Xu, C.-W. and Rea, C.B. 1993. Bootstrap confidence intervals for simulation outputs. J. Statzst. Compu~. Simul., 45, 249-255.
 
16
Shanker, A. and KeIton, W. D. 1994. Measuring output error due to input error in simulation: analysis of fitted vs. mixed empirical distributions for queues. To appear.
 
17
Silverman, B.W. and Young, G.A. 1987. The bootstrap: to smooth or not to smooth? Biome~rika, 74, 469-479.
 
18
Young, G.A. 1990. Alternative smoothed bootstraps. j.R. Sta~s~. Soc. B, 52,477-484.
 
19

CITED BY  8
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Collaborative Colleagues:
Russell C. H. Cheng: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: