Decision support for sentencing in a common law jurisdiction

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

Decision support for sentencing in a common law jurisdiction

Full text

Pdf (914 KB)

Source

International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law archive
Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law table of contents

College Park, Maryland, United States

Pages: 89 - 95

Year of Publication: 1995

ISBN:0-89791-758-8

Authors

N. Hutton	Centre for Law, Computers and Technology, The Law School, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G4 0RQ, UK
A. Patterson	Centre for Law, Computers and Technology, The Law School, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G4 0RQ, UK
C. Tata	Centre for Law, Computers and Technology, The Law School, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G4 0RQ, UK

Sponsors

IAAIL : Intl Asso for Artifical Intel & Law
UMIACS : U of MD Inst for Advanced Comp Studies
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 0, Downloads (12 Months): 13, Citation Count: 3

Additional Information:

references cited by index terms collaborative colleagues peer to peer

Tools and Actions:	Request Permissions Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/222092.222145 What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Grover, V., K.Fielder, and J.Teng, Exploring the success of Information technology enabled business process reengineering. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 41:3 (1994), 276-284.
	2	Wilson, F., and j.Wilson, The role of computer systems in organizational decision making. The Information Society. 10:3 (1994), 173-180.
	3	Chan, J. A computerised sentencing information system for New South Wales courts. Computer Law and Practice. (1991), 137-150.
	4	Doob, A., and N.Park, Computerized sentencing information for judges: an aid to the sentencing process. Criminal Law Quarterly. 30:1 (1987), 54-72.
	5	Murbach, R., and E.Nonn, Sentencing by artificial intelligence tools: some possibilities and limitations. Joint Meeting of the Law and Society Association and the International Sociological Association. Amsterdam. (1991).
	6	Ruth Murbach , Éva Nonn, Similarity in harder cases: sentencing for fraud, Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.236-244, June 15-18, 1993, Amsterdam, The Netherlands [doi>10.1145/158976.159006]
	7	E. Simon , G. Gaes, ASSYST - computer support for guideline sentencing, Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.195-200, May 1989, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada [doi>10.1145/74014.74039]
	8	Bainbridge, D. CASE: Computer assisted sentencing in magistrates' courts, Proceedings of BiLETA Conference, 1991.
	9	Bain, W. Judge. In Inside case-based reasoning, Reisbeck and Schank (eds), Erlbaum, Northvale, NJ, 1989.
	10	Kolodner, j. An introduction to case-based reasoning. Artificial Intelligence Review. 6:3-34 (1992), 3-34.
	11	Janet Kolodner, Case-based reasoning, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, 1993
	12	Evangelos Simoudis, Using Case-Based Retrieval for Customer Technical Support, IEEE Expert: Intelligent Systems and Their Applications, v.7 n.5, p.7-12, October 1992 [doi>10.1109/64.163667]
	13	Skalak, D., and E.Rissland, Arguments and cases: an inevitable intertwining. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 1: i (1992), 3-44.
	14	Kathryn E. Sanders, Representing and reasoning about open-textured predicates, Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.137-144, May 1991, Oxford, England [doi>10.1145/112646.112663]
	15	I-Iansen, J., R.Meservy and L.Wood, Indexing tree and pruning concepts to support case-based reasoning. Omega. 22:4 (1994),361-369
	16	Janet L. Kolodner, Improving human decision making through case-based decision aiding, AI Magazine, v.12 n.2, p.52-68, Summer 1991
	17	Shneiderman, B. Direct manipulation: a step beyond programming languages. IEEE Computer. 16:(1983), 57- 69.
	18	Frohlich, D. The history and future of direct manipulation. Behaviour and Information Technology. 12:6 (1993), 315-S29.
	19	Gentium 1.7.1, Planning Sciences Ltd, Ipswich.
	20	Ben Schneiderman, Dynamic Queries for Visual Information Seeking, IEEE Software, v.11 n.6, p.70-77, November 1994 [doi>10.1109/52.329404]

CITED BY 3

	Uri J. Schild , Ruth Kannai, Intelligent computer evaluation of offender's previous record, Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, June 24-28, 2003, Scotland, United Kingdom
	Uri J. Schild , Ruth Kannai, Intelligent computer evaluation of offender's previous record, Artificial Intelligence and Law, v.13 n.3, p.373-405, January 2005
	Chao-Lin Liu , Cheng-Tsung Chang , Jim-How Ho, Classification and clustering for case-based criminal summary judgments, Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, June 24-28, 2003, Scotland, United Kingdom