Abstraction, ethics and software: why don't the rules work?

ABSTRACT

A theory is presented that one of the reasons why the use of unlicensed software is so widespread and unstigmatized is that legislatures, courts and other bodies which create policy operate at a higher level of abstraction than do individuals, and that abstraction is a key factor in the divergence of societal behavior from that condoned by legal statute. This theory is explored through a pilot study consisting of medium depth interviews with two volunteers who had used unlicensed software. Their attitudes, understanding of the law, and characterization of their use of unlicensed software as based on “need” is reported. In addition, the concept of face is examined, and how it is maintained while violating law. It is suggested that further studies, using multiple methodologies, (in-depth interview, focus groups, and surveys) be conducted prior to developing further policy or legislation regarding intellectual property protection for software.

REFERENCES

• 1: ADAPSO. (1984). Thou shalt not dupe. Arlington, VA" ADAPSO.
• 2: Alfmo, M. (1991 ). Intellectual property and copyright ethics. Business & Professional Ethics Journal, 10, 85-109.
• 3: Cohen, M. (1927). Property and sovereignty. Cornell Law Quarterly 13, 8-30, and reprinted In D. Johnson & J. Snapper (Eds.) (1985). Ethical issues in the use of computers (pp. 293-304). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing
• 4: Deetz, S. (1994). Communication studies as a disciplinary response to contemporary social problems.. In (Ed.). Future of the Field (pp. 1 - 18).
• 5: Forester, T. & Morrison, P. (I 990). Software theft. In (Ed.). Computer ethics: Cautionary tales and ethical dilemmas in computing (pp. 27-39). Cambridge, MA: M1T Press
• 6: Gemignani, M. (1985). Legal protection for computer software: The view from "79. In D. johnson & J. Snapper (Eds.). Ethical issues in the use of computers (pp. 294-324). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing
• 7: Goffman, E. (1967). On face-work. In (Ed.). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior (pp. 5-45). New York: Pantheon Books
• 8: McCmcken, G. (1988). The long interview. Qualitative Research Methods. 13. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
• 9: Steering Committeee for Intellecttml Property Issues in Software, Computer Science and Telecommunications Board & National Research Council Commission on Physical Sciences, M. (1991). Intellectual property issues in software. Washington, D.C." National Academy Press.
• 10: Swinyard, W.R., Rinne, H., & Keng Kau, A. (1990). The morality of software piracy: A cross-cultural analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 9, 655-664.
• 11: Taylor, G.. & Shim, J.P. (1993). A comparative examination of attitudes toward software piracy among business professors and executives. Human Relations, 46, 419- 433.
• 12: Weber, J (1993). Exploring the relationship between personal values and moral reasoning. Human Relations, 46, 435-463.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.7 THE COMPUTING PROFESSION
      K.7.m Miscellaneous
          Subjects: Ethics**

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.1 MODELS AND PRINCIPLES
      H.1.2 User/Machine Systems
          Subjects: Human factors

  K. Computing Milieux
  K.4 COMPUTERS AND SOCIETY
      K.4.2 Social Issues
          Subjects: Abuse and crime involving computers**
  K.5 LEGAL ASPECTS OF COMPUTING

General Terms:
Human Factors, Legal Aspects, Theory