ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A primal null-space affine-scaling method
Full text PdfPdf (1.30 MB)
Source ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS) archive
Volume 20 ,  Issue 3  (September 1994) table of contents
Pages: 373 - 392  
Year of Publication: 1994
ISSN:0098-3500
Authors
K. Kim  Kei-Myung Univ., Daegu, Korea
J. L. Nazareth  Washington State Univ., Pullman
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 9,   Downloads (12 Months): 26,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/192115.192153
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This article develops an affine-scaling method for linear programming in standard primal form. Its descent search directions are formulated in terms of the null-space of the linear programming matrix, which, in turn, is defined by a suitable basis matrix. We describe some basic properties of the method and an experimental implementation that employs a periodic basis change strategy in conjunction with inexact computation of the search direction by an iterative method, specifically, the conjugate-gradient method with diagonal preconditioning. The result of a numerical study on a number of nontrivial problems representative of problems that arise in practice are reported and discussed.A key advantage of the primal null-space affine-scaling method is its compatibility with the primal simplex method. This is considered in the concluding section, along with implications for the development of a more practical implementation.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
ADLER, I., KARMARKAR, N., RESENDE, M. G. C., AND VEIGA, G. 1986. An implementation of Karmarkar's algorithm for linear programming. Math. Program. 44, 297-336.
 
2
 
3
DANTZIG, G. B. 1963. Linear Programming and Extensions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
 
4
DANTZIG, G. B., AND YE, Y. 1990. A build-up interior method for linear programming: Affine scaling form. Tech. Rep. SOL 90-4, Systems Optimization Lab., Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif.
 
5
DEMBO, R., AND SAHI, S. 1984. A convergent framework for constrained nonlinear optimization. School of Organization and Management Working Paper, Series B #69, Yale Univ., New Haven, Conn.
 
6
DIKIN, I. I. 1967. Iterative solution of problems of linear and quadratic programming. Soy. Math. Doklady 8, 674-675.
 
7
GAY, D. M. 1986. Electronic mail distribution of linear programming test problems. Numerical Analysis Manuscript 86-0, AT & T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, N.J.
 
8
 
9
GILL, P. E., MURRAY, W., SAUNDERS, M. A., AND WRIGHT, M. H. 1987. Maintaining LU factors of a general sparse matrix. Lin. Alg. Appl. 88/89, 239-270.
 
10
 
11
 
12
KIM, K., AND NAZARETH, J. L. 1992. Implementation of a primal null-space affine scaling method and its extensions. Tech. Rep. 92-1, Washington State Univ., Pullman, Wash.
 
13
LUSTIG, I. J., MARSTEN, R. E., AND SHANNO, D. F. 1992. Computational experience with a globally convergent primal-dual predictor-corrector algorithm for linear programming. Tech. Rep. SOR 92-10, Dept. of Civil Engineering and Operations Research, Princeton Univ., Princeton, N.J.
 
14
 
15
MEHROTRA, S. 1989. Implementations of affine scaling methods: Approximate solutions of systems of linear equations using preconditioned conjugate-gradient methods. Tech. Rep. 89-04, Dept. of IEMS, Northwestern Umv., Evanston, Ill.
 
16
MURTAGH, B. A., AND SAUNDERS, M. A. 1983. MINOS user's guide. Tech. Rep. SOL 83-20, Stanford Optimization Lab., Stanford, Calif.
 
17
NAZARETH, J. L. 1993. Quadratic and conic approximating models in linear programming. MPS-COAL Bull. 23 (Dec.).
 
18
 
19
20
 
21
NAZARETH, J. L. 1985. Hierarchical implementation of optimization methods. In Numerical Optimizatio,. SIAM, Philadelphia, Penn., 199 210.
 
22
RErD, J. K. 1976. Fortran subroutines for handling sparse linear programming bases. A.E.R.E.- R.8269, Computer Science and Systems Div., AERE Harwell, Oxfordshlre, U.K.
 
23
 
24
STEWART, G. W. 1988. On scaled projections and pseudo-inverses. Computer Science Tech. Rep. Series, TR-2026, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, Md.
 
25
TSENG, P. 1992. Partial affine-sca|ing for linearly constrained minimization. Dept. of Mathematics, Univ of Washington, Seattle (preprint).
 
26
VANDERBEI, R. J., MEKETON, M. S., AND FREEDMAN, B~ A. 1986. A modification of Karmarkar's algorithm. Algorlthmlca 1,395 409.
 
27


REVIEW

"Joseph M. Lambert : Reviewer"

The primal null space affine scaling method was first proposed by Nazareth [1] to solve linear programming problems. Affine scaling is an offshoot of Karmarkar's method. An advantage of the null space version of the affine scaling method is th  more...