ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Line search algorithms with guaranteed sufficient decrease
Full text PdfPdf (1.27 MB)
Source ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS) archive
Volume 20 ,  Issue 3  (September 1994) table of contents
Pages: 286 - 307  
Year of Publication: 1994
ISSN:0098-3500
Authors
Jorge J. Moré  Argonne National Lab, Argonne, IL
David J. Thuente  Argonne National Lab, Argonne, IL
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 29,   Downloads (12 Months): 200,   Citation Count: 10
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/192115.192132
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The development of software for minimization problems is often based on a line search method. We consider line search methods that satisfy sufficient decrease and curvature conditions, and formulate the problem of determining a point that satisfies these two conditions in terms of finding a point in a set T(&mgr;). We describe a search algorithm for this problem that produces a sequence of iterates that converge to a point in T(&mgr;) and that, except for pathological cases, terminates in a finite number of steps. Numerical results for an implementation of the search algorithm on a set of test functions show that the algorithm terminates within a small number of iterations.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
AL-BAALI, M. 1985. Descent property and global convergence of the Fletcher-Reeves method with inexact line searches. IMA J. Namer. Anal. 5, 121-124.
 
2
 
3
BYRD, R. H., NOCEDAL, J., AND YUAN, Y. 1987. Global convergence of a class of quasi-Newton methods on convex problems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 24, 1171-1190.
 
4
DE~, J. E., A~D SCm~AB~L, R. E. 1983. N~rner~cal Method~ for Unconstrained Optimization and Nonhnear Equations. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
 
5
 
6
 
7
GILBERT, J. C., AND NOCEDAL, J. 1992. Global convergence properties of conjugate gradient methods for optimization. SIAM J. Optim. 2, 21-42.
 
8
G~LL, P. E., ANn MURKY, W. 1974. Safeguarded steplength algorithms for optimization using descent methods. Rep. NAC 37, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, England.
 
9
GILL, P. E., MURRAY, W., SAUNVERS, M. A., AND WRIGHT, M. H. 1979. Two steplength algorithms for numerical optimization. Rep. SOL 79-25, Systems Optimization Laboratory, Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif.
 
10
HAGER, W. W. 1989. A derivative-based bracketing scheme for univariate minimization and the conjugate gradient method. Comput. Math. Appl. 18, 779-795.
 
11
LEMARECnAL, C. 1981. A view of line-searches. In Optimization and Optimal Control, A. Auslender, W. Oettli, and J. Stoer, Eds. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Science, vol. 30. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 59 78.
 
12
 
13
MOR~, J. J., AND SORENSEN, D. C. 1984. Newton's method. In Studies in Numerical Analysis, G. H. Golub, Ed. Mathematical Association of America, Washington, D.C., 29 82.
 
14
 
15
POWELL, M. J. D. 1976. Some global convergence properties of a variable metric method without line searches. In Nonlinear Programming, R. W. Cottie and C. E. Lemke, Eds. SIAM-AMS Proceedings, vol. IX. American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I., 53-72.
16
17
18
 
19
SH~NO, D. F., ~D PHVA, K. H. 1980. Remark on Algorithm 500. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 6, 618-622.
 
20
YANAL H., OZAWA, M., AND KANEKO, S. 1981. Interpolation methods in one dimensional optimization. Computing 27, 155-163.

CITED BY  10
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Collaborative Colleagues:
Jorge J. Moré: colleagues
David J. Thuente: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: