ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Accreditation: does it enhance quality?
Full text PdfPdf (641 KB)
Source Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education archive
Proceedings of the twenty-fifth SIGCSE symposium on Computer science education table of contents
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Pages: 145 - 149  
Year of Publication: 1994
ISBN:0-89791-646-8
Also published in ...
Author
Evelyn P. Rozanski  Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY
Sponsor
SIGCSE: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 0,   Downloads (12 Months): 12,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/191029.191090
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Accreditation, considered to be the one formal mechanism for assessing quality in the postsecondary environment, focuses on determining and encouraging acceptable levels of educational quality. In particular, specialized program accreditation is purported to enhance program quality.This exploratory study used a nationwide mail questionnaire to a stratified random sampling of 100 department heads of the units administering baccalaureate Computer Science programs. The purpose was to gain an understanding of how Computer Science programs and departments were related to selected indicators of faculty and program quality.Several differences and some similarities exist between the accredited and non-accredited groups. The median of the data for each indicator suggested a quality breakpoint to be used in defining two indices. It was found that for each of the two indices, the accredited group outperformed the non-accredited group by thirty percent. The implication is that Computer Science programs that follow accreditation guidelines have the potential for increasing their quality indicators.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Babbie, E., & Wagenaar, T. C. (1989). The practice of social research (5th ed.). Belmont, CA" Wadsworth.
2
 
3
Bjomson, J. D. (1986). Computer Science- A profession? Thirty-first IEEE, Computer Society International Conference Proceedings, 494-496.
 
4
 
5
Booth, T. (1986). Computing Sciences accreditation at the age of one. Thirty-first IEEE, Computer Society International Conference Proceedings, 493.
6
 
7
Council on Postsecondary Accreditation. (1991). Dissertations, general research, reports and articles relating to accreditation 1985.1990. Washington, DC: Author.
 
8
 
9
 
10
Kuh, G. D. (1981). Indices of quality in the undergraduate experience (AAHE-ERIC Higher Education Research Report No. 4). Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
 
11
Lawrence, J. K., & Solmon, L. C. (1981). Reputational ratings and undergraduate education assessment. In R. I. Miller (Ed.), New Directions for Institutional Research # 29 (pp. 1-14). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12
 
13
 
14
Young, K. E., & Chambers, C. M. (1980). Accrediting agency approaches to academic program evaluation. In E. C. Craven (Ed.), New Directions for Institutional Research No. 27, (pp. 89-104). San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
 
15



Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: