ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
To link or not to link: an empirical comparison of hypertext linking strategies
Full text PdfPdf (738 KB)
Source ACM Special Interest Group for Design of Communication archive
Proceedings of the 10th annual international conference on Systems documentation table of contents
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Pages: 221 - 231  
Year of Publication: 1992
ISBN:0-89791-532-1
Authors
Sponsors
Northern Telecomm : Northern Telecomm
SIGDOC: ACM Special Interest Group for Design of Communications
Bell Northern Res. : Bell Northern Resources
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 0,   Downloads (12 Months): 6,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/147001.147035
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Little is known about Hypertext writing style. This study examines the effects of link quantity and quality on usability. Our chosen domain is technical documentation which has a very regular writing style and organization. We compare two Hypertext Networks: one network has intuitively created links and the other is an algorithmic enhancement of it. The enhanced network has the same number of destination links, but more total link-anchors. Twelve subjects (six for each system) were asked to answer a set of eleven questions by navigating through the networks. We were interested in investigating three issues: efficiency (how many nodes need to be visited), speed (how much time is required) and accuracy (what is the error rate). Results showed that the lightly linked network required users to visit significantly more nodes to answer a question than the heavily linked equivalent. Heavy linking enabled users to find the answers to questions more quickly, but not significantly so. There was little difference in the error rate.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
Apple
Apple Computer Inc. Cupertino, CA.
 
Appleton
Appleton, B., SuperCard, Silicon Beach Software Inc. San Diego CA, 1989.
 
Brockman
 
Card
 
Carver
Carver, R.P., Reading Rate, A Review of Research and Theory, Academic Press 1990.
 
Conklin
Conklin, J., A Survey of Hype~ext, MCC Technical Report STP-356-86, MCC Software Technology Program, Austin, TX, January 1987.
 
De Young
 
Eastgate
"Afternoon", East~ate Systems, Cambridge, MA.
Egan
 
Fitts
Fitts, P.M. The information Capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Ex~rimental Psychology, 47,1954.
Furnas
 
Furuta
Glushko
 
Goodman
 
IBM
IBM, International Business Machines Inc. Austin TX.
 
Marchionini
Nelson
 
Nielsena
Nielsen, J. "Hy~rtext and Hype~~m", Academic Press, 1990.
 
Nielsenb
Nielsen, J. and L. Hardman, Evaluating Hypertext Usability, Hypertext '89 Course Notes. ACM 1989.
Nielsenc
 
Perlman
Evaluating Hypermedia Systems, Panel Discussion in CHI '90, ACM Press.
 
Price
 
Rubens
 
Shebilske
Shebilske, W. and D.F. Fisher, "Eye Movements and Context Effects during Reading of extended discourse", in Eye Movements in Reading, Perceptual and Language Processes, Academic Press 1983.
 
Shneiderman
Shneiderman. B, C. Plaisant, R. Botafogo, D. Hopkins and W. Weiland. Visual Engagement and Low Cognitive Load in Browsing Hypertext. University of Maryland, Dept. of Computer Science Technical Report 2433, March 1990.
 
Smith
Smith, J.B., Stephen F. Weiss, Gordon J. Ferguson, Jay D. Bolter, Marcy Lansman and David V. Beard. WE: A Writing Environment for Professionals, Technical Report, 86-025, Department of Computer Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, August 1986.
 
Symbolics
Symbolics User Manual, Symbolics Inc, Cambridge, MA.
 
Tombaugh
Walker
 
Woods
Woods, W. "What's in a Link, in Readings in Knowledge Representation, ed. Brachman and Levesque, Morgan Kaufman, 1988.
 
Wright
Wright, P. and A. Lickorish, Proofreading tasks on screen and paper, Behavior and Information Technology Vol. 2, no. 3,1983. pp 227-235
 
Yankelovich

Collaborative Colleagues:
Craig Boyle: colleagues
Swee Hor Teh: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: