ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The solution of almost block diagonal linear systems arising in spline collocation at Gaussian points with monomial basis functions
Full text PdfPdf (650 KB)
Source ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS) archive
Volume 18 ,  Issue 2  (June 1992) table of contents
Pages: 193 - 204  
Year of Publication: 1992
ISSN:0098-3500
Authors
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 26,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/146847.146926
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Numerical techniques based on piecewise polynomial (that is, spline) collation at Gaussian points are exceedingly effective for the approximate solution of boundary value problems, both for ordinary differential equations and for time dependent partial differential equations. There are several widely available computer codes based on this approach, all of which have at their core a particular choice of basis representation for the piecewise polynomials used to approximate the solutions. Until recently, the most popular approach was to use a B-spline representation, but it has been shown that the B-spline basis is inferior, both in operation counts and conditioning, to a certain monomial basis, and the latter has come more into favor. In this paper, we describe a linear algebraic equations which arise in spline collocation at Gaussian points with such a monomial basis. It is shown that the new package, which implements an alternate column and row pivoting algorithm, is a distinct improvement over existing packages from the points of view of speed and storage requirements. In addition, we describe a second package, an important special case of the first, for solving the almost block diagonal systems which arise when condensation is applied to the systems arising in spline collocation at Gaussian points, and also in other methods for solving two-point boundary value problems, such as implicit Runge-Kutta methods and multiple shooting.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
ASCH~R, U., PRUESS, S., AND RUSSELL, R.D. On spline basis selection for solving differential equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 20, I (1983), 121-142.
 
3
 
4
DE BOOR, C. A Practical Guide to Splines. Springer-Verlag, 1978.
5
6
7
 
8
DONGARRA, J. J., MOLER, C. B., BUNCH, J. R., AND STEWART, G. W. LINPACK User's Guide. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, 1979.
 
9
LENTINI, M, OSBORNE, M. R., AND RUSSELL, R.D. The close relationship between methods for solving two-point boundary value problems SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 22, 2 (1985), 280-309.
 
10
MAJAESS, F , AND KEAST, P. Algorithms for the solution of linear systems arising from monomial spline barns functions. Tech. Rep. 1987CS-11, Dept. of Mathematics, Statistics and Computing Science, Dalhousie Univ., Halifax~ Canada
 
11
MAJAESS, F., KEAST, P., FAIRWEATHER, G., AND BENNETT, K. R Fortran packages for the solution of almost block diagonal hnear systems arising in spline collocation at Gaussian points with monomial basis functions Tech. Rep. CCS-90-3, Center for Computational Sciences, Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
12
 
13
Mum, P.J. Implicit Runge-Kutta methods for two-point boundary value problems. Ph D. Thesm, Univ of Toronto, Tech. Rep. 175/84, Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 4A7.
 
14
STOER, J_ AND BULmSCH, R. Introduction to Numerical Analysis, Springer-Verlag, 1980.
 
15
VARAH, J. M Alternate row and column elimination for solving certain hnear systems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 13, L (1976), 71-75.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Gouad Majaess: colleagues
Patrick Keast: colleagues
Graeme Fairweather: colleagues
Karin R. Bennett: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: