ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
An exploratory study on joint analysis of visual classification in narrow domains and the discriminative power of tags
Full text PdfPdf (740 KB)
Source
International Multimedia Conference archive
Proceeding of the 2nd ACM workshop on Multimedia semantics table of contents
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
SESSION: User-based and event semantics table of contents
Pages 40-47  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-316-7
Authors
Oge Marques  Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA
Mathias Lux  Klagenfurt University, Klagenfurt, Austria
Sponsors
SIGMULTIMEDIA: ACM Special Interest Group on Multimedia
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 12,   Downloads (12 Months): 62,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1460676.1460685
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The popularity of social media sharing sites such as Flickr has driven a significant amount of research on the analysis of information contained in the tags used to annotate images. Many of such tags are not useful to describe the contents of an image and are often labeled as not descriptive or even noisy. In this work we focus on the descriptiveness of a tag in an exploratory way, within a relatively narrow domain, and with the help of a visual classifier. Preliminary experimental results demonstrate the possibility to infer descriptiveness of tags from a joint analysis of tag entropy calculations and the results of an automated visual classifier with a limited number of classes without taking tag content or tag co-occurrence into account. We postulate that these experiments can be extended and improved toward a working solution that might answer the question: Given a semantic category, which tags would you use for searching an image from that category?


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
M. Aurnhammer, P. Hanappe, and L. Steels. Integrating collaborative tagging and emerging semantics for image retrieval. In Proceedings of the Collaborative Web Tagging Workshop (WWW 2006), 2006.
3
 
4
 
5
6
 
7
A. Friedman. Framing pictures: the role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist. J Exp Psychol Gen, 108(3):316--55, 1979.
8
 
9
 
10
M. Guy and E. Tonkin. Folksonomies - tidying up tags? D-Lib Magazine, 12(1), January 2006. ISSN 1082--9873.
11
 
12
E. Hyvonen, A. Styrman, and S. Saarela. Ontology-based image retrieval. In Towards the semantic web and web services, Proceedings of XML Finland 2002 Conference, pages 15--27, 2002.
 
13
 
14
J. Luo and M. Boutell. Natural scene classification using overcomplete ICA. Pattern Recognition, 38(10):1507--1519, 2005.
 
15
P. Mika. Ontologies are us: A unified model of social networks and semantics. In International Semantic Web Conference, LNCS, pages 522--536. Springer, 2005.
16
 
17
 
18
A. Payne and S. Singh. Indoor vs. outdoor scene classification in digital photographs. Pattern Recognition, 38(10):1533--1545, 2005.
 
19
N. Rasiwasia, N. Vasconcelos, and P. Moreno. Query by semantic example. Proceedings of the International Conference in Image and Video Retrieval, pages 51--60, 2006.
20
21
 
22
 
23
R. Troncy, J. van Ossenbruggen, J. Z. Pan, and G. Stamou. Image annotation on the semantic web. Technical report, World Wide Web Consortium, August 2007.
 
24
 
25
 
26
27

Collaborative Colleagues:
Oge Marques: colleagues
Mathias Lux: colleagues