ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Range: exploring implicit interaction through electronic whiteboard design
Full text PdfPdf (2.16 MB)
Source
Computer Supported Cooperative Work archive
Proceedings of the ACM 2008 conference on Computer supported cooperative work table of contents
San Diego, CA, USA
SESSION: Social displays table of contents
Pages 17-26  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-007-4
Authors
Wendy Ju  Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
Brian A. Lee  Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
Scott R. Klemmer  Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 29,   Downloads (12 Months): 192,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1460563.1460569
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

An important challenge in designing ubiquitous computing experiences is negotiating transitions between explicit and implicit interaction, such as how and when to provide users with notifications. While the paradigm of implicit interaction has important benefits, it is also susceptible to difficulties with hidden modes, unexpected action, and misunderstood intent. To address these issues, this work presents a framework for implicit interaction and applies it to the design of an interactive whiteboard application called Range. Range is a public interactive whiteboard designed to support co-located, ad-hoc meetings. It employs proximity sensing capability to proactively transition between display and authoring modes, to clear space for writing, and to cluster ink strokes. We show how the implicit interaction techniques of user reflection (how systems indicate to users what they perceive or infer), system demonstration (how systems indicate what they are doing), and override (how users can interrupt or stop a proactive system action) can prevent, mitigate, and correct errors in the whiteboard's proactive behaviors. These techniques can be generalized to improve the designs of a wide array of ubiquitous computing experiences.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
Buxton, W. Integrating the Periphery and Context: A New Model of Telematics. In Proc. Graphics Interface 1995, (1995), 239--246.
 
3
Cavanagh, P. Attention routines and the Architecture of Selection. In Cognitive Neuroscience of Attention, Posner, Michael I, ed. Guilford Press (2004), 23--24.
 
4
Chase, W. G. and Simon, H. A. Perception in Chess. In Cognitive Psychology 4(1973), 55--81.
5
 
6
Clark, H. H. and Brennan, S. E. Grounding in Communication. In Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, Resnick, L. B., Levine, J. M. and Teasley, S. D. eds., American Psychological Association (1991), 127--149.
 
7
Clark, Herbert H. Pointing and Placing. In Pointing: Where Language, Culture and Cognition Meet. Kita Sotaro, ed. Lawrence Erlbaum (2003), 243--268.
8
9
10
 
11
Hall, E. The Hidden Dimension. Garden City, Doubleday, 1966.
 
12
Hartmann, B., Klemmer, S. R., Bernstein, M., and Mehta, N. d.tools: Visually Prototyping Physical UIs through Statecharts. In Extended Abstracts of UIST 2005, ACM Press (2005).
13
14
 
15
Ju, W. and Leifer, L. The Design of Implicit Interactions: Making Interactive Systems Less Obnoxious. In Design Issues, 24(3) Summer 2008, 72--84.
16
 
17
 
18
LaVie, N. Perceptual Load as a Necessary Condition for Selective Attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21:3 (1995), 451--468.
19
20
 
21
 
22
23
 
24
Pedersen, E. R. Tacit Interaction Talk in the Stanford University, Human-Computer Interaction Seminar series, May 14, 1999. Abstract online at: http://kraka.com/DesignPortfolio/tacit.html
25
 
26
Prante, T., Röcker, C., Streitz, N. A., Stenzel, R. , Magerkurth, C. , van Alphen, D. and Plewe, D. A. Hello.Wall -Beyond Ambient Displays. In Adjunct Proceedings of Ubicomp 2003. 277--278.
 
27
28
29
30
31
 
32
Weiser, M. The Computer for the 21st Century. Scientific American, 265:3 (September 1991), 94--104.
 
33
 
34
Weiser, M. and Brown, J. S. Center and periphery: Balancing the Bias of Digital Technology. In Blueprint for the Digital Economy, Tapscott, D. ed. McGraw-Hill (1998), 317--335.
 
35
Wroblewki, L. Visible Narratives: Understanding Visual Organization. On Boxes and Arrows, AIGA, January 20th, 2003.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Wendy Ju: colleagues
Brian A. Lee: colleagues
Scott R. Klemmer: colleagues