ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Collection-level analysis tools for books online
Full text PdfPdf (480 KB)
Source
Conference on Information and Knowledge Management archive
Proceeding of the 2008 ACM workshop on Research advances in large digital book repositories table of contents
Napa Valley, California, USA
SESSION: Content representation and discoverability table of contents
Pages 41-44  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-249-8
Author
Catherine C. Marshall  Microsoft Research, Mountain View, CA, USA
Sponsors
SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 21,   Downloads (12 Months): 70,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1458412.1458426
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Efforts to develop ebook-based functionality have focused thusfar on the individual artifact--the hardware and software reader--and on promoting user engagement with the page by supporting annotation, clipping, and navigation. In this position paper, I will discuss collection-level analytic functionality that will take advantage of the characteristics of online bodies of literature. This functionality includes (1) wisdom-of-crowds tools; (2) analytic tools for gathering; and (3) form- and function-based discovery tools.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
Betrisey, C., Blinn, J. F., Dresevic, B., Hill, B., Hitchcock, G., Keely, B., Mitchell, D.P., Platt, J. C., Whitted, T. 2000. Displaced Filtering for Patterned Displays. Digest of Society for Information Display Symposium 31, 1, pp. 296--299.
 
3
 
4
Feed Magazine. 1995. Page Versus Pixel. http://web.archive.org/web/19970225062835/http://www.feedmag.com/95.05dialog1.html.
5
6
 
7
Lynch, C. 2001. The Battle to Define the Future of the Book in the Digital World. First Monday 6, 6. http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue6_6/lynch/index.html
 
8
Marchionini, G. 2000. Evaluating Digital Libraries: A Longitudinal and Multifaceted View. Library Trends 49, 2, pp. 304--333.
9
10
11
12
 
13
McKnight, C. and Dearnley, J. Electronic Book Use in a Public Library. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 35, 4 (2003), 235--242.
 
14
Microsoft Reader Press Release. 2008. Downloaded from http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/features/2001/sep01/09-24ebooks.mspx on 20 July 2008.
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
Swanson, D.R. 1987. Two medical literatures that are logically but not bibliographically connected. JASIS, 38(4):228--233.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Catherine C. Marshall: colleagues