Improved query difficulty prediction for the web

ABSTRACT

Query performance prediction aims to predict whether a query will have a high average precision given retrieval from a particular collection, or low average precision. An accurate estimator of the quality of search engine results can allow the search engine to decide to which queries to apply query expansion, for which queries to suggest alternative search terms, to adjust the sponsored results, or to return results from specialized collections. In this paper we present an evaluation of state of the art query prediction algorithms, both post-retrieval and pre-retrieval and we analyze their sensitivity towards the retrieval algorithm. We evaluate query difficulty predictors over three widely different collections and query sets and present an analysis of why prediction algorithms perform significantly worse on Web data. Finally we introduce Improved Clarity, and demonstrate that it outperforms state-of-the-art predictors on three standard collections, including two large Web collections.

REFERENCES

• 1: G. Amati, C. Carpineto, and G. Romano. Query difficulty, robustness and selective application of query expansion. In Proceedings of the 25th European Conference on Information Retrieval, pages 127--137, 2004.
• 2: J. A. Aslam and V. Pavlu. Query hardness estimation using Jensen-Shannon divergence among multiple scoring functions. In Advances in Information Retrieval: 28th European Conference on IR Research, pages 198--209, 2007.
• 3: C. Clarke, N. Craswell, and I. Soboroff. Overview of the trec 2004 terabyte track. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Text REtrieval Conference, 2004.
• 4: Steve Cronen-Townsend , Yun Zhou , W. Bruce Croft, Predicting query performance, Proceedings of the 25th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, August 11-15, 2002, Tampere, Finland [doi>10.1145/564376.564429]
• 5: Fernando Diaz , Rosie Jones, Using temporal profiles of queries for precision prediction, Proceedings of the 27th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, July 25-29, 2004, Sheffield, United Kingdom [doi>10.1145/1008992.1008998]
• 6: B. He and I. Ounis. Inferring query performance using pre-retrieval predictors. In The Eleventh Symposium on String Processing and Information Retrieval (SPIRE), pages 43--54, 2004.
• 7: Djoerd Hiemstra, Term-specific smoothing for the language modeling approach to information retrieval: the importance of a query term, Proceedings of the 25th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, August 11-15, 2002, Tampere, Finland [doi>10.1145/564376.564385]
• 8: Djoerd Hiemstra , Stephen Robertson , Hugo Zaragoza, Parsimonious language models for information retrieval, Proceedings of the 27th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, July 25-29, 2004, Sheffield, United Kingdom [doi>10.1145/1008992.1009025]
• 9: Robert Krovetz, Viewing morphology as an inference process, Proceedings of the 16th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, p.191-202, June 27-July 01, 1993, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States [doi>10.1145/160688.160718]
• 10: Victor Lavrenko , W. Bruce Croft, Relevance based language models, Proceedings of the 24th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, p.120-127, September 2001, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States [doi>10.1145/383952.383972]
• 11: Jay M. Ponte , W. Bruce Croft, A language modeling approach to information retrieval, Proceedings of the 21st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, p.275-281, August 24-28, 1998, Melbourne, Australia [doi>10.1145/290941.291008]
• 12: Ian Soboroff, Does WT10g look like the web?, Proceedings of the 25th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, August 11-15, 2002, Tampere, Finland [doi>10.1145/564376.564475]
• 13: Vishwa Vinay , Ingemar J. Cox , Natasa Milic-Frayling , Ken Wood, On ranking the effectiveness of searches, Proceedings of the 29th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, August 06-11, 2006, Seattle, Washington, USA [doi>10.1145/1148170.1148239]
• 14: Elad Yom-Tov , Shai Fine , David Carmel , Adam Darlow, Learning to estimate query difficulty: including applications to missing content detection and distributed information retrieval, Proceedings of the 28th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, August 15-19, 2005, Salvador, Brazil [doi>10.1145/1076034.1076121]
• 15: Chengxiang Zhai , John Lafferty, Model-based feedback in the language modeling approach to information retrieval, Proceedings of the tenth international conference on Information and knowledge management, October 05-10, 2001, Atlanta, Georgia, USA [doi>10.1145/502585.502654]
• 16: Chengxiang Zhai , John Lafferty, A study of smoothing methods for language models applied to Ad Hoc information retrieval, Proceedings of the 24th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, p.334-342, September 2001, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States [doi>10.1145/383952.384019]
• 17: Yun Zhou , W. Bruce Croft, Query performance prediction in web search environments, Proceedings of the 30th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, July 23-27, 2007, Amsterdam, The Netherlands [doi>10.1145/1277741.1277835]

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.3 INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL
      H.3.3 Information Search and Retrieval

General Terms:
Algorithms, Performance

Keywords:
query clarity, query performance prediction