ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Dependent link padding algorithms for low latency anonymity systems
Full text PdfPdf (338 KB)
Source
Conference on Computer and Communications Security archive
Proceedings of the 15th ACM conference on Computer and communications security table of contents
Alexandria, Virginia, USA
SESSION: Anonymity table of contents
Pages 323-332  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-59593-810-7
Authors
Wei Wang  National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
Mehul Motani  National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
Vikram Srinivasan  Bell Labs Research, India , Bangalore, India
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGSAC: ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit, and Control
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 23,   Downloads (12 Months): 209,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1455770.1455812
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Low latency anonymity systems are susceptive to traffic analysis attacks. In this paper, we propose a dependent link padding scheme to protect anonymity systems from traffic analysis attacks while providing a strict delay bound. The covering traffic generated by our scheme uses the minimum sending rate to provide full anonymity for a given set of flows. The relationship between user anonymity and the minimum covering traffic rate is then studied via analysis and simulation. When user flows are Poisson processes with the same sending rate, the minimum covering traffic rate to provide full anonymity to m users is O(log m). For Pareto traffic, we show that the rate of the covering traffic converges to a constant when the number of flows goes to infinity. Finally, we use real Internet trace files to study the behavior of our algorithm when user flows have different rates.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
G. Danezis, "The traffic analysis of continuous-time mixes," in Proceedings of Privacy Enhancing Technologies Workshop (PET), 2004.
3
 
4
U. Moeller, L. Cottrell, P. Palfrader, and L. Sassaman, "IETF draft: Mixmaster protocol version 2," http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-sassaman-mixmaster-03.txt, 2004.
 
5
M. Reed, P. Syverson, and D. Goldschlag, "Anonymous connections and onion routing," IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 482--494, 1998.
 
6
7
 
8
A. Serjantov and P. Sewell, "Passive Attack Analysis for Connection--Based Anonymity Systems," in Proceedings of European Symposium on Research in Computer Security, 2003.
 
9
V. Anantharam and S. Verdu, "Bits through queues," IEEE Trans. on Information Theory, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 4--18, 1996.
 
10
 
11
P. Venkitasubramaniam, T. He, and L. Tong, "Relay secrecy in wireless networks with eavesdroppers," in Proceedings of Allerton Conference on Communication, Control and Computing, 2006.
 
12
 
13
 
14
P. Boucher, A. Shostack, and I. Goldberg, "Freedom systems 2.0 architecture,"White paper, Zero Knowledge Systems, Inc., December 2000.
 
15
S. J. Murdoch and P. Zielinski, "Sampled traffic analysis by internet-exchange-level adversaries," in Proceedings of Privacy Enhancing Technologies Workshop (PET), 2007.
 
16
17
 
18
 
19
V. Shmatikov and M. Wang, "Timing analysis in low-latency mix networks: attacks and defenses?" in Proceedings of ESORICS, 2006.
 
20
A. Serjantov and G. Danezis, "Towards an information theoretic metric for anonymity," in Proceedings of Privacy Enhancing Technologies Workshop (PET), 2002.
 
21
C. Diaz, S. Seys, J. Claessens, and B. Preneel, "Towards measuring anonymity," in Proceedings of Privacy Enhancing Technologies Workshop (PET), 2002.
 
22
B. Bollobas, Modern Graph Theory. Springer, 1998.
 
23
A. Blum, D. Song, and S. Venkataraman, "Detection of interactive stepping stones: Algorithms and confidence bounds," in Proceedings of International Symposium on Recent Advances In Intrusion Detection, 2004.
 
24
T. He and L. Tong, "Detecting information flows: Improving chaff tolerance by joint detection," in Proceedings of Annual Conference Information Sciences and Systems (CISS), 2007.
25
 
26
 
27
A. Papoulis and S. U. Pillai, Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes. 4th Ed. McGraw Hill, 2002.
 
28
P. Venkitasubramaniam, T. He, and L. Tong, "Anonymous networking amidst eavesdroppers," IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 2770--2784, 2008.
 
29
J. W. Cohen, The Single Server Queue. North-Holland, 1982.
 
30
 
31
N. L. for Applied Network Research., "Auckland-viii data set," http://pma.nlanr.net/Special/auck8.html, 2003.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Wei Wang: colleagues
Mehul Motani: colleagues
Vikram Srinivasan: colleagues