Opportunistic relaying vs. selective cooperation: analyzing the occurrence-conditioned outage capacity

ABSTRACT

Opportunistic Relaying (OR) and Selection Decode-and-Forward (SDF) cooperation protocols can both substantially improve the performance of wireless networks but fundamentally differ in utilized redundancy, relays, and channel knowledge. To analyze when SDF or OR improves error and data rate, we (1) derive their general outage probability and capacity for arbitrary relay configurations, (2) systematically benchmark both approaches in two-hop configurations, (3) study how often beneficial configurations occur in large networks, and, finally, condition our capacity results by this occurrence probability. Our results clearly show that OR maximizes the outage capacity at high acceptable error rate while SDF succeeds if a low error rate is required. SDF performs best if even the relays can cooperate among themselves, supported frequently in networks with more than three neighbors. Consequently, cooperating relays, adapting between OR and SDF, and joining these two approaches should be the focus of future protocol design. To this end, our paper provides a theoretical basis, adaptation rules, and design guidelines.

REFERENCES

• 1: Atheros. AR5414 Technical specifications, 6th edition, 2007.
• 2: A. Avestimehr and D. Tse. Outage capacity of the fading relay channel in the low-SNR regime. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 53(4):1401--1415, Apr. 2007.
• 3: Sanjit Biswas , Robert Morris, ExOR: opportunistic multi-hop routing for wireless networks, Proceedings of the 2005 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications, August 22-26, 2005, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
• 4: A. Bletsas, H. Shin, and M. Z. Win. Cooperative communications with outage-optimal opportunistic relaying. IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., 6(9):3450--3460, Sept. 2007.
• 5: J. Boyer, D. D. Falconer, and H. Yanikomeroglu. Diversity order bounds for wireless relay networks. In Proc. IEEE WCNC, Mar. 2007.
• 6: D. Brennan. Linear diversity combining techniques. Proc. IEEE, 91(2):331--356, Feb. 2003.
• 7: I. N. Bronshtein , K. A. Semendyayev , K. A. Kirsch, Handbook of mathematics (3rd ed.), Springer-Verlag, London, 1997
• 8: A. Host-Madsen. Capacity bounds for cooperative diversity. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 52(4):1522--1544, Apr. 2006.
• 9: T. E. Hunter, S. Sanayei, and A. Nosratinia. Outage analysis of coded cooperation. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 52(2):375--391, Feb. 2006.
• 10: J. N. Laneman, G. W. Wornell, and D. Tse. Cooperative diversity in wireless networks: Efficient protocols and outage behavior. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 50(12):3062--3080, Dec. 2004.
• 11: H. S. Lichte, S. Valentin, H. Karl, I. Aad, L. Loyola, and J. Widmer. Design and evaluation of a routing-informed cooperative MAC protocol for ad hoc networks. In Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, Apr. 2008.
• 12: P. Liu, Z. Tao, Z. Lin, E. Erkip, and S. Panwar. Cooperative wireless communications: A cross-layer approach. IEEE Wireless Commun. Mag., 13:84--92, Aug. 2006.
• 13: Bob O'Hara , Al Petrick, The IEEE 802.11 Handbook: A Designer's Companion, Standards Information Network IEEE Press, 1999
• 14: A. Sendonaris, E. Erkip, and B. Aazhang. Increasing uplink capacity via user cooperation diversity. In Proc. IEEE ISIT, Aug. 1998.
• 15: M. K. Simon and M.-S. Alouini. Digital Communications over Fading Channels. John Wiley & Sons, 2 edition, 2004.
• 16: David Tse , Pramod Viswanath, Fundamentals of wireless communication, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 2005
• 17: C. W. Yu. Quantitative analysis of multi-hop wireless networks using a novel paradigm. In Proc. ESCAPE. Springer, 2007.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  E. Data
  E.4 CODING AND INFORMATION THEORY
      Subjects: Formal models of communication

General Terms:
Design, Performance, Theory

Keywords:
capacity analysis, cooperative communication, relaying protocols