Revamping the IEEE 802.11a PHY simulation models

ABSTRACT

In simulating wireless networks, modeling of the physical layer behavior is an important yet difficult task. Modeling and estimating wireless interference is receiving great research attention, and is crucial in a wireless network performance study. The implementation of physical layer capture, preamble detection, and carrier sense threshold plays an important role in successful frame reception in the presence of interference. We showed in our previous testbed study that the operations of the frame reception and the capture effect in real IEEE 802.11a systems differ from those of popular research simulators. We present our modifications of the IEEE 802.11a PHY models to the current simulators. The modifications can be summarized as follows. (i) The current simulators' frame reception is based only on the received signal strength. However, the real 802.11 systems can start the frame reception only when the Signal-to-Interference Ratio (SIR) is high enough to detect the preamble. (ii) Different chipset vendors implement the frame reception and capture algorithms differently, resulting in different operations for the same event. We provide different simulation models for several popular chipset vendors and show the performance differences between the models. (iii) The current simulators set the carrier sense threshold equal to the receiver sensitivity. The standard however states that it should be 20 dB higher than the receiver sensitivity. We implement our modifications to the QualNet simulator and conduct a wireless network performance study to evaluate the impact of PHY model implementation.

REFERENCES

• 1: The Network Simulator 2 (NS-2), http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/
• 2: QualNet simulator, http://www.scalable-networks.com/
• 3: Jeongkeun Lee , Wonho Kim , Sung-Ju Lee , Daehyung Jo , Jiho Ryu , Taekyoung Kwon , Yanghee Choi, An experimental study on the capture effect in 802.11a networks, Proceedings of the the second ACM international workshop on Wireless network testbeds, experimental evaluation and characterization, September 10-10, 2007, Montreal, Quebec, Canada [doi>10.1145/1287767.1287772]
• 4: Andrzej Kochut , Arunchandar Vasan , A. Udaya Shankar , Ashok Agrawala, Sniffing Out the Correct Physical Layer Capture Model in 802.11b, Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols, p.252-261, October 05-08, 2004
• 5: Glenn Judd , Peter Steenkiste, Using physical layer emulation to understand and improve wireless networks, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 2006
• 6: PRISM Wireless LAN, Intersil Corporation, http://www.intersil.com/globespanvirata/
• 7: Atheros Communications, http://www.atheros.com/
• 8: IEEE 802.11a, Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) specifications: High-speed Physical Layer in the 5 GHz Band.
• 9: Jan Boer et al., Wireless LAN with Enhanced Capture Provision, US Patent 5987033, Nov. 16, 1999.
• 10: Christopher Ware, Joe Chicharo and Tadeusz Wysocki, Simulation of Capture Behaviour in IEEE 802.11 Radio Modems, In Proc. IEEE VTC'01 Fall, Oct. 2001.
• 11: Hoon Chang, Vishal Misra and Dan Rubenstein, A General Model and Analysis of Physical Layer Capture in 802.11 Networks, In Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, Barcelona, Spain, Apr. 2006.
• 12: Theodore Rappaport, Wireless Communications: Principles and Practice, Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2001
• 13: Ding Xu, Jianhua Zhang, Xinying Gao, Ping Zhang and Yufei Wu, Indoor Office Propagation Measurements and Path Loss Models at 5.25 GHz, In Proc. IEEE VTC'07 Fall, Oct. 2007.
• 14: A. Kamerman and L. Monteband, WaveLAN-II: A High-Performance Wireless LAN for the Unlicensed Band, Bell Labs Technical Journal, Vol.2 no.3, pp. 118--133, Summer 1997.
• 15: R. Jain, D. Chiu and W. Hawe, A Quantitative Measure Of Fairness And Discrimination For Resource Allocation In Shared Computer Systems, Technical Report TR-301, DEC Research Report, Sept. 1984.
• 16: Christopher Ware, John Judge, Joe Chicharo and Eryk Dutkiewicz, Unfairness and Capture Behaviour in 802.11 Adhoc Networks, In Proc. IEEE ICC, New Orleans, LA, June 2000.
• 17: Sachin Ganu , Kishore Ramachandran , Marco Gruteser , Ivan Seskar , Jing Deng, Methods for restoring MAC layer fairness in IEEE 802.11 networks with physical layer capture, Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on Multi-hop ad hoc networks: from theory to reality, May 26-26, 2006, Florence, Italy [doi>10.1145/1132983.1132986]
• 18: Xue Yang and Nitin Vaidya, On Physical Carrier Sensing in Wireless Ad Hoc Networks, In Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, Miami, FL, USA, Mar. 2005.
• 19: Hongqiang Zhai and Yuguang Fang, Physical Carrier Sensing and Spatial Reuse in Multirate and Multihop Wireless Ad Hoc Networks, In Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, Barcelona, Spain, Apr. 2006.
• 20: Ting-Yu Lin and Jennifer C. Hou, Interplay of Spatial Reuse and SINR-Determined Data Rates in CSMA/CA-Based, Multi-Hop, Multi-Rate Wireless Networks, In Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, Anchorage, Alaska, May 2007.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.6 SIMULATION AND MODELING
      I.6.4 Model Validation and Analysis

General Terms:
Design, Verification

Keywords:
IEEE 802.11a, carrier sensing, interference, physical layer capture, simulations