ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A testbed for characterizing dynamic response of virtual environment spatial sensors
Full text PdfPdf (960 KB)
Source Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology archive
Proceedings of the 5th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology table of contents
Monteray, California, United States
Pages: 15 - 22  
Year of Publication: 1992
ISBN:0-89791-549-6
Authors
Sponsors
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 15,   Citation Count: 6
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/142621.142624
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper describes a testbed and method for characterizing the dynamic response of the type of spatial displacement transducers commonly used in virtual environment (VE) applications. The testbed consists of a motorized rotary swing arm that imparts known displacement inputs to the VE sensor. The experimental method involves a series of tests in which the sensor is displaced back and forth at a number of controlled frequencies that span the bandwidth of volitional human movement. During the tests, actual swing arm angle and reported VE sensor displacements are collected and time stamped. Because of the time stamping technique, the response time of the sensor can be measured directly, independent of latencies in data transmission from the sensor unit and any processing by the interface applications running on the host computer. Analysis of these experimental results allows sensor time delay and gain characteristics to be determined as a function of input frequency. Results from tests of several differnt VE spatial sensors (Ascension, Logitech, and Polhemus) are presented here to demonstrate use of the testbed and method.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Burdea, G.C., Dunn, S.M, Immcndorf, C.H., and Mallik, M. (1991). Real-time sensing of tooth position for dental digital subtraction radiography. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., BME-38 (4), 366-378.
 
3
Bryson, S. (1992). Measurement and calibration of static distortion of position data from 3D trackers. SPIE Conference on Stereoscopic Displays and Applications Iii, San Jose CA. SPIE paper 16694)9.
 
4
Bryson, S., and Fisher, S.S. (1990). Defining, modelling and measuring system lag in virtual environments. Stereoscopic Displays and Applications, Proceedings SPIE 1256.
 
5
Durlach, N.L, Pew, R.W., Aviles, W.A., DiZio, P.A., and Zeltzer, D.L., eds. (1992). Virtual Environment Technology for Training (VEIT). The Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Research Consortium (VETREC). Bolt, Bcranek, and Newman Report 7661.
 
6
Ellis, S.R. (1991). The nature and origin of virtual environments: a bibliographical essay. Computing Systems in Engineering, 2 (4) 321-347.
 
7
Freund, H.-J., Hefter, H., Homberg, V., and Reiners, K. (1984). Determinants of tremor rate. In Findlcy, L.J., and Capildeo, R., eds., Movement Disorders: Tremor. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 195-204.
 
8
Held, R., F_.fsathiou, A., and Greene, M. (1966). Adaptation to displaced and delayed visual feedback from the hand. J. exp. Psychol., 72 (6) 887- 891.
 
9
Hirose, M., Kijima, R., Sato, Y., and Ishii, T. (1990). A study of modification of actual environment by see-through HMD (in Japanese). Proceedings, Sixth Symposium on Human Interface, Tokyo.
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
Polhemus Navigation Sciences (1992). Technical Note: Latencym 3SPACEr Magnetrakr, Tracker, Digitizer and Isotrakr, Colchester VT.
 
14
Sheridan, T.B., and FcrreU, W.R. (1963). Remote manipulative control with transmission delay. IEEE Trans. hum. Factors Electron., HFE-4 (I), 25-29.
 
15
Tharp, G., Liu, A., and Stark, L.W. (1992). Timing considerations in helmet mounted display performance. SPIE Conference on Human Vision, Visual Processing and Digital Display III, San Jose CA. SPIE paper 1666-56.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Bernard D. Adelstein: colleagues
Eric R. Johnston: colleagues
Stephen R. Ellis: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: