ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Search strategies in multimodal image retrieval
Full text PdfPdf (2.03 MB)
Source ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 348 archive
Proceedings of the second international symposium on Information interaction in context table of contents
London, United Kingdom
SESSION: Interactive IR I table of contents
Pages 13-20  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-310-5
Authors
Stina Westman  Helsinki University of Technology, TKK Finland
Antti Lustila  Helsinki University of Technology, TKK Finland
Pirkko Oittinen  Helsinki University of Technology, TKK Finland
Sponsors
: Yahoo! Research
: Information Retrieval Facility
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
British Computer Society : BCS
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 12,   Downloads (12 Months): 88,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1414694.1414700
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper reports on a study on search strategies in multimodal image retrieval. We analyzed the queries and search tactics employed by image journalism professionals and non-professionals in a user test. Transaction log data show that searchers are able to combine up to four query modes into a query. Most queries combined at least two of the modes (text, color, sketch, quality, and category). Task type was shown to affect the choice of which modes to employ. Known item and data search tasks led to queries combining text, color and category modes. Visually cued tasks resulted in searches combining several content-based and textual modes. Conceptual tasks led to a large number of queries by text and category only. User background also significantly affected the types of queries constructed. Professionals used the color mode more whereas non-professionals drew more sketches. Non-professionals were more likely to switch query modes whereas professionals edited the content of their queries. We described the search processes with Markov models and maximal repeating patterns. Common patterns and probable transitions dealt with querying, inspecting result images and saving them into the workspace or iterating queries of the same type. The results indicate a need to support multimodal image query formulation.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Christel, M. 2007. Examining User Interactions with Video Retrieval Systems. Proceedings of SPIE Vol. 6506 Multimedia Content Access: Algorithms and Systems.
 
2
Christel, M. and Conescu, R. 2006. Mining Novice User Activity with TRECVID Interactive Retrieval Tasks. Proceedings of CIVR 2006, 21--30.
3
 
4
Enser, P. G. B. 1993. Query analysis in a visual information retrieval context. Journal of Document and Text Management. 1, 1, 25--52.
 
5
Fidel, R. 1997. Image Retrieval task: Implications for the Design and Evaluation of Image Databases. The New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia. 3, 181--199.
 
6
Goodrum, A. A., Bejune, M. M. and Siochi, A. C. 2003. A State Transition Analysis of Image Search Patterns on the Web. Proceedings of CIVR 2003, LNCS 2728, 281--290.
 
7
Hung, T-Y. 2005. Search Moves and Tactics for Image Retrieval in the Field of Journalism: A Pilot Study. Journal of Educational Media and Library Sciences. 42, 3, 329--346.
 
8
Jaimes, A. 2006. Human Factors in Automatic Image Retrieval System Design and Evaluation. Proceedings of IS&T/SPIE Internet Imaging 2006.
 
9
Jörgensen, C. 1999. Access to Pictorial Material: A Review of Current Research and Future Prospects. Computers and the Humanities. 33, 4, 293--318.
 
10
 
11
 
12
Marziliano, P., Dufaux, F., Winkler, S. and Ebrahimi, T. 2002. A no-reference perceptual blur metric. Proceedings of International Conference on Image Processing, vol. 3, 57--60.
13
14
15

Collaborative Colleagues:
Stina Westman: colleagues
Antti Lustila: colleagues
Pirkko Oittinen: colleagues