ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Parametric yield management for 3D ICs: Models and strategies for improvement
Full text PdfPdf (1.23 MB)
Source
ACM Journal on Emerging Technologies in Computing Systems (JETC) archive
Volume 4 ,  Issue 4  (October 2008) table of contents
Article No. 19  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISSN:1550-4832
Authors
Cesare Ferri  Brown University, Providence, RI
Sherief Reda  Brown University, Providence, RI
R. Iris Bahar  Brown University, Providence, RI
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 23,   Downloads (12 Months): 190,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1412587.1412592
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Three-Dimensional (3D) Integrated Circuits (ICs) that integrate die with Through-Silicon Vias (TSVs) promise to continue system and functionality scaling beyond the traditional geometric 2D device scaling. 3D integration also improves the performance of ICs by reducing the communication time between different chip components through the use of short TSV-based vertical wires. This reduction is particularly attractive in processors where it is desirable to reduce the access time between the main logic die and the L2 cache or the main memory die. Process variations in 2D ICs lead to a drop in parametric yield (as measured by speed, leakage and sales profits), which forces manufacturers to speed bin their chips and to sell slow chips at reduced prices. In this paper we develop a model to quantify the impact of process variations on the parametric yield of 3D ICs, and then we propose a number of integration strategies that use a graph-theoretic framework to maximize the performance, parametric yield and profits of 3D ICs. Comparing our proposed strategies to current yield-oblivious methods, it is demonstrated that it is possible to increase the number of 3D ICs in the fastest speed bins by almost 2×, while simultaneously reducing the number of slow ICs by 29.4%. This leads to an improvement in performance by up to 6.45% and an increase of about 12.48% in total sales revenue using up-to-date market price models.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Baas, B. M. 1999. A low-power, high-performance 1024-point FFT processor. IEEE J. Solid-State Circ. 34, 3, 380--387.
 
2
 
3
Banerjee, K., Souri, S. J., Kaput, P., and Saraswat, K. C. 2001. 3-D ICs: A novel chip design for deep-submicrometer interconnect performance and systems-on-chip integration. Proc. IEEE 89, 5, 602--633.
 
4
 
5
Beyne, E. 2004. 3D interconnection and packaging: Impending reality or still a dream? In Proceedings of the IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, 138--139.
6
7
 
8
Bowman, K., Duvall, S., and Meindl, J. 2002. Impact of die-to-die and within-die parameter fluctations on the maximum clock frequency distribution for gigascale integration. IEEE J. Solid State Electron. 37, 2, 183--190.
 
9
Burger, D. C. and Austin, T. M. 1997. The SimpleScalar tool set, version 2.0. Tech. Rep. CS-TR-1997-1342.
 
10
Burns, J. A., Aull, B. F., Chen, C., Chen, C.-L., Keast, C. L., Knecht, J., Suntharalingam, V., Warner, K., Wyatt, P., and Yost, D.-R. 2006. A wafer-scale 3-D circuit integration technology. IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 53, 10, 2507--2516.
 
11
 
12
13
 
14
 
15
Davis, J. A., Venkatesan, R., Kaloyeros, A., Beylansky, M., Souri, S. J., Banerjee, K., Saraswat, K. C., Rahman, A., Reif, R., and Meindl, J. 2001. Interconnect limits on gigascale integration (GSI) in the 21st century. Proc. IEEE 89, 3, 305--324.
 
16
 
17
Fukushima, T., Yamada, Y., and Koyanagi, M. 2006. New three-dimensional integration technology using chip-to-wafer bonding to acheive ultimate super-chip integration. Japan. J. Appl. Phys. 45, 4B, 3030--3035.
 
18
 
19
 
20
Humenay, E., Arjan, D., and Skadron, K. 2006. Impact of parameter variations on multi-core chips. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Architectural Support for Gigascale Integration, 1--9.
 
21
Im, S. and Banerjee, K. 2000. Full chip thermal analysis of planar (2-D) and vertically intergrated (3-D) high performance ICs. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting, 727--730.
 
22
ITRS. 2008. International technology roadmap for semiconductors. http://public.itrs.net.
 
23
 
24
Kim, C., Kim, J.-J., Chang, I.-J., and Roy, K. 2006. PVT-Aware leakage reduction for on-die caches with improved read stability. IEEE J. Solid-State Circ. 41, 1, 170--178.
 
25
Kuhn, H. W. 1955. The Hungarian method for the assignment problem. Naval Res. Logist. Q. 2, 83--97.
 
26
Lattice. 2008. LatticeMico32 asynchronous SRAM controller datasheet. http://www.latticesemi.com/documents/doc21610x19.pdf.
27
 
28
29
30
31
 
32
Munkres, J. 1957. Algorithms for the assignment and transportation problems. J. Soc. Industrial Appl. Math. 5, 1, 32--38.
 
33
Orshansky, M., Milnor, L., Chen, P., Keutzer, K., and Hu, C. 2002. Impact of spatial intrachip gate length variability on the performance of high-speed digital circuits. IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aided Des. Integr. Circ. Syst. 21, 5, 544--553.
 
34
Patti, R. S. 2006. Three-Dimensional integrated circuits and the future of systems-on-chip designs. Proc. IEEE 94, 6, 1214--1224.
 
35
PTM. 2008. Predictive technology model. http://www.eas.asu.edu/~ptm/introduction.html.
36
 
37
 
38
 
39
Saxena, P., Menezes, N., Cocchini, P., and Kirkpatrick, D. A. 2004. Repeater scaling and its impact on CAD. IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aided Des. Integr. Circ. Syst. 23, 4, 451--463.
 
40
Scheiring, C. 2004. Advanced-Chip-to-Wafer technology: Enabling technology for volume production of 3D system integration on wafer level. In Proceedings of the International Microelectronics And Packaging Society, 1--11.
 
41
Smith, L., Smith, G., Hosali, S., and Arkalgud, S. 2007a. 3-D: It all comes down to cost. In Proceedings of the 3-D Architectures for Semiconductor Integration and Packaging.
 
42
Smith, L., Smith, G., Hosali, S., and Arkalgud, S. 2007b. Yield considerations in the choice of 3D technology. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Semiconductor Manufacturing, 535--537.
 
43
SPEC. 2000. SPEC 2000 benchmarks. http://www.spec.org/cpu/.
 
44
 
45
 
46
Wilton, S. and Jouppi, N. P. 1996. CACTI: An enhanced cache access and cycle time model. IEEE J. Solid-State Circ. 31, 5, 677--688.
 
47
Wuu, J., Weiss, D., Morganti, C., and Dreesen, M. 2005. The asynchronous 24MB on-chip level-3 cache for a dual-core itanium family processor. In Proceedings of the International Solid-State Circuits Conference, 488--612.
48
 
49

Collaborative Colleagues:
Cesare Ferri: colleagues
Sherief Reda: colleagues
R. Iris Bahar: colleagues