ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Relays, base stations, and meshes: enhancing mobile networks with infrastructure
Full text PdfPdf (3.10 MB)
Source
International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking archive
Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Mobile computing and networking table of contents
San Francisco, California, USA
SESSION: Mobile computing table of contents
Pages 81-91  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-096-8
Authors
Nilanjan Banerjee  University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA
Mark D. Corner  University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA
Don Towsley  University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA
Brian N. Levine  University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA
Sponsors
SIGMOBILE: ACM Special Interest Group on Mobility of Systems, Users, Data and Computing
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 36,   Downloads (12 Months): 512,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1409944.1409955
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Networks composed of mobile nodes inherently suffer from intermittent connections and high delays. Performance can be improved by adding supporting infrastructure, including base stations, meshes, and relays, but the cost-performance trade-offs of different designs is poorly understood. To examine these trade-offs, we have deployed a large-scale vehicular network and three infrastructure enhancement alternatives. The results of these deployments demonstrate some of the advantages of each kind of infrastructure; however, these conclusions can be applied only to other networks of similar characteristics, including size, wireless technologies, and mobility patterns. Thus we complement our deployment with a demonstrably accurate analytical model of large-scale networks in the presence of infrastructure.

Based on our deployment and analysis, we make several fundamental observations about infrastructure-enhanced mobile networks. First, if the average packet delivery delay in a vehicular deployment can be reduced by a factor of two by adding x base stations, the same reduction requires 2x mesh nodes or 5x relays. Given the high cost of deploying base stations, relays or mesh nodes can be a more cost-effective enhancement. Second, we observe that adding small amount of infrastructure is vastly superior to even a large number of mobile nodes capable of routing to one another, obviating the need for mobile-to-mobile disruption tolerant routing schemes.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
3
 
4
BANERJEE, N., CORNER, M. D., AND LEVINE, B. N. An Energy-Efficient Architecture for DTN Throwboxes. In Proceedings of Infocom (May 2007).
 
5
BRUNO, R., CONTI, M., AND GREGORI, E. Mesh Networks: Commodity Multihop Ad hoc Networks. IEEE Communications Magazine 43, 3 (March 2005).
 
6
BURGESS, J., GALLAGHER, B., JENSEN, D., AND LEVINE, B. N. MaxProp: Routing for Vehicle-Based Disruption-Tolerant Networks. In Proceedings of Infocom (April 2006).
7
 
8
CAVALCANTI, D., SADOK, D., AND KELNER, J. Mobile Infostations: A Paradigm for Wireless Data Communications. In Wireless and Optical Communications (2002).
 
9
CHAINTREAU, A., HUI, P., CROWCROFT, J., DIOT, C., GASS, R., AND SCOTT, J. Impact of Human Mobility on the Design of Opportunistic Forwarding Algorithms. In Proceedings of Infocom (2006).
 
10
DOUSSE, P. O., AND HASLER, M. Connectivity in Ad-hoc and Hybrid Networks. In Proceedings of Infocom (2002).
 
11
GOODMAN, D. J., BORRAS, J., MANDAYAM, N. B., AND YATES, R. D. INFOSTATIONS: A New System Model for Data and Messaging Services. In Proceedings of Vehicular Technology Conference (Phoenix, AZ, May 1997), pp. 969--973.
 
12
GROENEVELT, R., NAIN, P., AND KOOLE, G. The Message Delay in Mobile Ad hoc Networks. In Proceedings of Performance (2005).
13
 
14
IBRAHIM, M., HANBALI, A. A., AND NAIN, P. Delay and Resource Analysis in MANETs in Presence of Throwboxes. In Proceedings of International Symposium on Computer Performance, Modeling, Measurements, and Evaluation (2007).
15
 
16
JUANG, P., OKI, H., WANG, Y., MARTONOSI, M., PEH, L., AND RUBENSTEIN, D. Energy-Efficient Computing for Wildlife Tracking: Design Tradeoffs and Early Experiences with ZebraNet. SIGOPS Oper. Syst. Rev. 36, 5 (2002), 96--107.
 
17
JUPITERRESEARCH. Municipal Wireless: Partner to Spread Risks and Costs While Maximizing Benefit Opportunities. Tech. rep., Jupitermedia Corporation, 2005.
 
18
KURTZ, T. J. Solutions of Ordinary Differential Equations as Limits of Pure Jump Markov Process. In Journal of Applied Probabilities (1970).
 
19
LIU, B., LIU, Z., AND TOWSLEY, D. On the Capacity of Hybrid Wireless Networks. In Proceedings of Infocom (2003).
 
20
MARN, W., RICE, J., FLETCHER, C., CREBER, R., BABICZ, R., AND ROGERS, K. The Evolution of Radio/Acoustic Communication Gateway Buoys. In Proceedings of IEEE Oceans (2005).
 
21
 
22
RADIO. 9XTend™ OEM RF Module, Product Manual.
 
23
RICE, J. Seaweb Acoustic Communication and Navigation Networks. In Proceedings of International Conference Underwater Acoustic Measurements: Technologies & Results (July 2005).
24
25
 
26
ZHANG, X., NEGLIA, G., KUROSE, J., AND TOWSLEY, D. Performance Modeling of Epidemic Routing. In Proceedings of IFIP Networking (2006).
 
27
ZHAO, W., CHEN, Y., AMMAR, M. H., CORNER, M., LEVINE, B. N., AND ZEGURA, E. Capacity Enhancement using Throwboxes in DTNs. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Mobile Ad hoc and Sensor Systems (MASS) (Oct 2006).


Collaborative Colleagues:
Nilanjan Banerjee: colleagues
Mark D. Corner: colleagues
Don Towsley: colleagues
Brian N. Levine: colleagues