|
ABSTRACT
Recent ethnomethodological work in context and location awareness has indicated that location cues hold many socially meaningful cues for interaction. Location-aware technologies are therefore expected to bring about a shift in social life. Yet little is known about underlying psychological effects and the role of specific design decisions. The present research aims to experimentally test some of these effects. In a laboratory experiment participants' location in a virtual game world was shared. The effects of location Cueing frequency and Cueing mode (explicit or inferred closeness) on affinity, social presence, awareness, and game experience were explored. Higher cue frequencies resulted in higher perceived challenge and flow experienced in the game. The data also showed trends of heightened awareness and more behavioural engagement. A trend towards more psychological involvement was found when cues explicitly communicated that players shared a location in the game.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Aiello, J. R. 1987. Human spatial behavior. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of Environmental Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 505--531). New York: Wiley Interscience.
|
| |
2
|
Argyle, M., & Dean, J. 1965. Eye contact, distance, and affiliation. Sociometry, 28, 289--304.
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
Byrne, D. E. 1971. The Attraction Paradigm. New York: Academic Pres.
|
| |
5
|
Couch, C. J. 1970. Dimensions of association in collective behavior episodes, Sociometry, 33, 457--471.
|
| |
6
|
Duckham, M. & Kulik, L. 2005. A formal model of obfuscation and negotiation for location privacy. PERVASIVE 2005, 152--170.
|
 |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
Harms, C., & Biocca, F. 2004. Internal consistency and reliability of the networked minds social presence measure. In M. Alcaniz & B.Rey (Eds.), 7th Annual International Workshop: Presence 2004.
|
| |
9
|
IJsselsteijn, W. A., de Kort, Y. A. W. & Poels, K. 2008. The Game Experience Questionnaire: Development of a self-report measure to assess the psychological impact of digital games. Manuscript in preparation.
|
| |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
de Kort, Y. A. W., & IJsselsteijn, W. A. 2007. On sociospatial context and social interaction. D2.1.1 Literature survey on socio-spatial context and so-cial interaction. EU FP6 PASION deliverable.
|
| |
12
|
de Kort, Y. A. W., IJsselsteijn, W. A., & Poels, K. 2007. Digital games as social presence technology: Development of the social presence in gaming questionnaire (SPGQ). In PRESENCE 2007, 195--203. Barcelona: Starlab.
|
| |
13
|
McCroskey, J. C., & McCain, T. A., 1974. The measurement of interpersonal attraction. Speech Monographs, 41, 261--266.
|
| |
14
|
Michilini, R. L., Passalacque, R., & Cusimano, J. 1976. Effects of seating arrangement on group participation. Journal of Social Psychology, 99, 179--186.
|
| |
15
|
Moreland, R. L., & Beach, S. R. 1990. Exposure effects in the classroom: the development of affinity among students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 255--276.
|
| |
16
|
|
| |
17
|
Priest, R. F., & Sawyer, J. 1967. Proximity and peership: bases of balance in interpersonal attraction, The American Journal of Sociology, 72, 633--649.
|
| |
18
|
Niklas Ravaja , Timo Saari , Marko Turpeinen , Jari Laarni , Mikko Salminen , Matias Kivikangas, Spatial Presence and Emotions during Video Game Playing: Does It Matter with Whom You Play?, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, v.15 n.4, p.381-392, August 2006
[doi> 10.1162/pres.15.4.381]
|
|