Gaining acceptance of simulation: a social challenge

ABSTRACT

The issue of how to deal with human behaviour in discrete-event simulation models has become more prominent due to the increased use of the technique in business process initiatives, particularly those in the service industries. Approaches to modelling human behaviour in discrete event simulations has been categorised by level of abstraction. Three methods described (termed simplify, facilitate and integrate) require no actual modelling of human behaviour in the simulation itself and three methods (termed resource/entity, generic, individual) require an increasing level of modelling detail. It has been found that there are significant challenges in modelling people at an individual level and alternatives such as using simulation with other OR techniques and simulating at a generic person level may represent a more appropriate approach.

REFERENCES

• 1: Baines T.; Mason, S.; Siebers, P., Ladbrook, J., 2004, "Humans: the missing link in manufacturing simulation?", Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 12, 515--526.
• 2: Baines, T.; Asch, R.; Hadfield, L.; Mason, J. P.; Fletcher, S.; Kay, J. M., 2005, "Towards a theoretical framework for human performance modelling within manufacturing systems design", Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 13, 486--504.
• 3: Benedettini, O.; Baines, T.; Ladbrook, J. 2006. "Human Performance Modelling within Manufacturing Systems Design: From Theory to Practice", In Proceedings of the 2006 OR Society Simulation Workshop.
• 4: Willi Bernhard , Axel Schilling, Simulation of group work processes in manufacturing, Proceedings of the 29th conference on Winter simulation, p.888-891, December 07-10, 1997, Atlanta, Georgia, United States [doi>10.1145/268437.268671]
• 5: Brailsford, S.; Schmidt, B., 2003, "Towards incorporating human behaviour in models of health care systems: An approach using discrete-event simulation", European Journal of Operational Research, 150, 19--31.
• 6: Checkland, P. B. 1981. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.
• 7: David Dahn , K. Ronald Laughery, The integrated performance modeling environment—simulating human-system performance, Proceedings of the 29th conference on Winter simulation, p.1141-1145, December 07-10, 1997, Atlanta, Georgia, United States [doi>10.1145/268437.268751]
• 8: Benjamin Dubiel , Omer Tsimhoni, Integrating agent based modeling into a discrete event simulation, Proceedings of the 37th conference on Winter simulation, December 04-07, 2005, Orlando, Florida
• 9: Elliman, T.; Eatock, J.; Spencer, N., 2005, "Modelling knowledge worker behaviour in business process studies", The Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 18(1), 79--94.
• 10: Fowler, J. W. & Rose, O., 2004, "Grand Challenges in Modeling and Simulation of Complex Manufacturing Systems", SIMULATION, 80, no. 9, 469--476.
• 11: Rita Freudenberg , Henry Herper, Simulation of workers in manufacturing systems, Proceedings of the 30th conference on Winter simulation, p.951-956, December 13-16, 1998, Washington, D.C., United States
• 12: Greasley, A., 2005, "Using system dynamics in a discrete-event simulation study of a manufacturing plant", International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 25(5/6), 534--548
• 13: Greasley, A. 2006. Operations Management, John Wiley and Sons Ltd., Chichester, UK.
• 14: Greasley, A. and Barlow, S., 1998, "Using simulation modelling for BPR: resource allocation in a police custody process", International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 18, 978--988.
• 15: Jackson, M. C. 2003. Systems Thinking: Creative Holism for Managers, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, UK.
• 16: Juran, D. C. and Schruben, L. W., 2004, "Using worker personality and demographic information to improve system performance prediction", Journal of Operations Management, 22, 355--367.
• 17: Kim, D. H. 1992. "Systems Archetypes: Diagnosing Systemic Issues and Designing High-Leverage Interventions", Toolbox Reprint Series: Systems Archetypes, Pegasus Communications, 3--26.
• 18: Romn Laughery, Using discrete-event simulation to model human performance in complex systems, Proceedings of the 31st conference on Winter simulation: Simulation---a bridge to the future, p.815-820, December 05-08, 1999, Phoenix, Arizona, United States [doi>10.1145/324138.324506]
• 19: Charles M. Macal , Michael J. North, Tutorial on agent-based modeling and simulation part 2: how to model with agents, Proceedings of the 38th conference on Winter simulation, December 03-06, 2006, Monterey, California
• 20: C. Dennis Pegden , Randall P. Sadowski , Robert E. Shannon, Introduction to Simulation Using SIMAN, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, NY, 1995
• 21: Robinson, S., 2001, "Soft with a hard centre: discrete-event simulation in facilitation", Journal of the Operational Research Society, 52, 905--915.
• 22: Schmidt, B. 2005. "Human Factors in Complex Systems: The Modeling of Human Behaviour", In Proceedings 19^th European Conference of Modelling and Simulation, ECMS.
• 23: Silverman, B. G.; Cornwell, J.; O'Brien, K. 2003. "Human Performance Simulation" in Ness, J. W., Rizer, D. R., & Tepe, V. (Eds) Metrics and methods in human performance research toward individual and small unit simulation, Human Systems Information Analysis Centre: Washington DC.
• 24: Barry G. Silverman, Expert critics: operationalizing the judgement/decision-making literature as a theory of “bugs” and repair strategies, Knowledge Acquisition, v.3 n.2, p.175-214, June 1991 [doi>10.1016/1042-8143(91)90004-7]

INDEX TERMS

Keywords:
discrete event simulation, human behaviour