ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
An exposure study of technology transaction
Full text PdfPdf (108 KB)
Source Spring Simulation Multiconference archive
Proceedings of the 2007 spring simulation multiconference - Volume 2 table of contents
Norfolk, Virginia
SESSION: Formal models table of contents
Pages 185-191  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:1-56555-313-6
Author
Hui-Hua Ou-Yang  Ching Yun University, Zhonghe City, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
Sponsors
SCS : Society for Modeling and Simulation International
ACM/SIGSIM : Association for Computing Machinery/Special Interest Group on Simulation
Publisher
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 0,   Downloads (12 Months): 6,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

"Technology transaction" is the means of obtaining technologies for competition in small and intermediate size businesses. The difficulty of "technology transaction" issues has been much discussed in the transaction motivation and negotiation areas, but the search stage of technology transaction is still rarely studied in recent years. Moreover, the related methodologies are not suitable for adaption to a complexity study as a form of technology transaction.

This research builds a simulation model to expose the problem of searching for technology by case study dates and using complexity software. The findings of this study are that technology searching truly displays the characteristics of a "complexity adaption system". Second, the best efficiency for searching for technology occurs when technological knowledge is concurrently increasing in an existing area and diversifying into new fields. Third, networks of technology transaction should be analyzet from three perspectives at once: concentration, connection, and cluster.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Bidault, F. & Fischer, W. A. H.,(1994),"Technology Transactions: Networks over Markets", R&D Management, Vol. 24 (4), pp. 373--386.
 
2
Chesbrough, H., (2004), "The Sustainability of Technology Markets", Journal of Management and Governance, Vol. 8, pp. 117--120.
 
3
Chen, Wei-Ru, (2003), " Looking forward or looking backward? firms' technological search behavior under uncertainty" the annual Conference of the Strategic Management Society in Baltimore, MD, USA.
 
4
Eisenhardt, K. (1989),"Making fast strategic decisions in high-volocity environments", Academy of Management Journal, Vol.33, pp. 543--576.
 
5
Katila, R. & Ahuja, G.,(2002),"Something old, something new: a longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction", Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 45(6), PP.1183--1194.
 
6
Levinthal, D. A, & March, J. G., (1981), "A Model of Adaptive Organizational Search", Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol.2, PP.307--333.
 
7
Mogavero, L. N. & Shane, R. S., (1982), "What Every Engineer Should Know about Technology Transfer and Innovation", New York and Basel: Marcel Dekker, Inc.
 
8
Roger, E. M., (1972), "Key concepts and models", Introducing Technological Change for Economic Growth and Development, Michigan State University Press, pp. 85--101.
 
9
Teece, D. J., (1997), " Technology Transfer by the Multinational Firms: The Resource Cost of Transferring Technological Know-How," The Economic Journal, Vol. 87, pp. 242--261.
 
10