ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Using the MANA agent-based simulation tool to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of ground-based and airborne communications jammers in countering the IED threat to ground convoys
Full text PdfPdf (344 KB)
Source Spring Simulation Multiconference archive
Proceedings of the 2007 spring simulation multiconference - Volume 2 table of contents
Norfolk, Virginia
SESSION: Agent organization modeling table of contents
Pages 113-118  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:1-56555-313-6
Authors
Umit Ayvaz  Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey CA
Murat Dere  Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey CA
Yao Ming Tiah  Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey CA
Sponsors
SCS : Society for Modeling and Simulation International
ACM/SIGSIM : Association for Computing Machinery/Special Interest Group on Simulation
Publisher
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 28,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs) are proving to be significant threats in modern asymmetric warfare. The United States is investigating and pressing into service numerous techniques to counter this threat. One approach is employment of jammer equipment to disrupt signals used to detonate the devices from some stand-off position. The purpose of this paper is investigate the use of agent-based models to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of ground vehicle-based and airborne communications jammers in protecting a ground convoy against IED attacks. The agent-based simulation tool, MANA, is used to simulate the scenarios. Simulation outcomes are data farmed across relevant ranges of input values pertaining to tactical factors such as jamming effectiveness, length of time IEDs are suppressed, and convoy speed. The average number of convoy vehicles killed by IEDs is the measure of effectiveness (MOE) used to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of the two types of jamming systems in countering the threat. Tactical factors having significant impact on the MOE are also identified. The importance of the work is not the quantitative outcomes per se, but the modeling, experimental design, and data analysis approaches used that can possibly serve as guidance to future studies of this nature.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Lauren, M. K., and Stephen, R. T. 2002. "Map-Aware Non-uniform Automata -- a New Zealand Approach to Scenario Modeling. Journal of Battlefield Technology. 5(1), pp 27--31.
 
2
Chioppa, T. H. 2002. "Efficient Nearly-Orthogonal and Space-filling Experimental Designs for High-Dimensional Complex Models" Doctoral Dissertation. Naval Postgraduate School. Monterey, California. September.
 
3
Lucas, T., Sanchez, S. M., Brown, L., and Vinyard, W. 2002. "Better Designs for High-Dimensional Explorations of Distillations." Maneuver Warfare Science, G. Horne and S. Johnson, eds. Pp 17--45.
 
4
Roginski, J. W. 2006. "Emergency First Response to a Crisis Event: A Multi-Agent Simulation Approach." Master's Thesis. Naval Postgraduate School. Monterey, California. June.
 
5
Weisstein, E. W. "Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test," From MathWorld---A Wolfram Web Resource. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/WilcoxonSignedRankTest.html
 
6
S-PLUS from Insightful: http://www.insightful.com/products/splus/
 
7
JMP from SAS: http://www.jmp.com/software/

Collaborative Colleagues:
Umit Ayvaz: colleagues
Murat Dere: colleagues
Yao Ming Tiah: colleagues