ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
If I were you: double appraisal in affective agents
Full text PdfPdf (579 KB)
Source
International Conference on Autonomous Agents archive
Proceedings of the 7th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems - Volume 3 table of contents
Estoril, Portugal
SESSION: Virtual agents track table of contents
Pages 1233-1236  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-0-9817381-2-X
Authors
Ruth Aylett  Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK
Sandy Louchart  Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
AAAI : Association for the Advancement of Artifical Intelligence
Publisher
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 51,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

We report the implementation and evaluation of a Simulation Theory (ST) approach to the Theory of Mind in intelligent graphical agents driven by an affective agent architecture FAtiMA. The existing cognitive appraisal mechanism is adapted to produce a second appraisal cycle, a double appraisal, in order to evaluate the emotional impact of possible actions. The action with the greatest emotional impact is selected as a means of producing more interesting dramatic actions. A variant in which the actual minds of characters present are used is also implemented and evaluated. Results show that these mechanisms do produce more interesting stories.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Aylett, R and Louchart, S. (2003) Towards a narrative theory of VR. Virtual Reality Journal Vol 7. (2003). pp2--9.
 
2
Aylett, R. S; Louchart, S; Dias, J; Paiva, A; Vala, M; Woods, S. & Hall, L. (2006) Unscripted Narrative for affectively driven characters. IEEE Journal of Graphics and Animation. May/June 2006 (Vol. 26, No. 3) pp. 42--52
 
3
Aylett, R. S and Louchart, S (2007) Being there: Participants and Spectators in Interactive Narrative M. Cavazza and S. Donikian (Eds.): ICVS 2007, LNCS 4871, pp. 116--127, 2007. Springer-Verlag 2007
 
4
 
5
Castelfranchi, C. (2005) Mind as an anticipatory device: For a theory of expectations. Proceedings, BVAI 2005. international symposium, vol. 3704, pp. 258--276,
 
6
Dias, J and Paiva, A. (2005) Feeling and Reasoning: a Computational Model. 12th Portuguese Conference on Artificial Intelligence, EPIA (2005). Springer. pp 127--140.
 
7
Gallese, V & Goldman, A. (1998) Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,
 
8
Gordon, R. 1986: Folk Psychology as Simulation. <u>Mind and Language</u>, 1, 158--171
 
9
Gratch, J & Marsella, S (2005) Lessons From Emotion Psychology For The Design Of Lifelike Characters. Applied Artificial Intelligence 19(3--4): 215--233
10
 
11
Lazarus, R. (1991) Emotion and adaptation. NY Oxford University Press (1991).
 
12
Ortony, A and Clore, G and Collins, A. (1988) The cognitive structure of emotions. Cambridge University Press. (1988).
 
13
Stich, S. & Nichols, S., 1992, "Folk psychology: Simulation or tacit theory?" Mind and Language 7, 35--71.
 
14
Whiten, A. (1991) Natural Theories of Mind. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK. (1991)

Collaborative Colleagues:
Ruth Aylett: colleagues
Sandy Louchart: colleagues