ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Author-topic evolution analysis using three-way non-negative Paratucker
Full text PdfPdf (86 KB)
Source
Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval archive
Proceedings of the 31st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval table of contents
Singapore, Singapore
POSTER SESSION: Posters group 4: theory and IR models table of contents
Pages 819-820  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-164-4
Authors
Wei Peng  Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
Tao Li  Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 13,   Downloads (12 Months): 126,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1390334.1390521
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Analyzing three-way data has attracted a lot of attention recently due to the intrinsic rich structures in real-world datasets. The PARATUCKER model has been proposed to combine the axis capabilities of the Parafac model and the structural generality of the Tucker model. However, no algorithms have been developed for fitting the PARATUCKER model. In this paper, we propose TANPT algorithm to solve the PARATUCKER model. We apply the algorithm for temporal relation co-clustering on author-topic evolution. Experiments on DBLP datasets demonstrate its effectiveness.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
B. W. Bader, R. A. Harshman, and T. G. Kolda. Temporal analysis of semantic graphs using asalsan. In Proceedings of ICDM'07, pages 33--42, 2007.
 
2
H. Cho, I. Dhillon, Y. Guan, and S. Sra. Minimum sum squared residue co-clustering of gene expression data. In Proceedings of SIAM'04, pages 22--24, 2004.
 
3
M. Chu, F. Diele, R. Plemmons, and S. Ragni. Optimality, computation and interpretation of nonnegative matrix factorizations, 2005.
4
 
5
R. Harshman and M. Lundy. Uniqueness proof for a family of models sharing features of tucker's three-mode factor analysis and parafac/candecomp. Psychometrika, 61(1):133--154, 1996.
 
6
D. D. Lee and S. H. Seung. Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization. Nature, 401(6755):788--791, 1999.%
 
7
R.A.Harshman. Foundations of the parafac procedure: models and conditions for an 'explanatory' multi-modal factor analysis. UCLA working papers in phonetics 16, pages 1--84, 1970.
 
8
9