ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Limits of opinion-finding baseline systems
Full text PdfPdf (92 KB)
Source
Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval archive
Proceedings of the 31st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval table of contents
Singapore, Singapore
POSTER SESSION: Posters group 2: blog, tagging, opinion analysis and web IR table of contents
Pages 747-748  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-164-4
Authors
Craig Macdonald  University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kngdm
Ben He  University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kngdm
Iadh Ounis  University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kngdm
Ian Soboroff  NIST, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, USA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 22,   Downloads (12 Months): 201,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1390334.1390483
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In opinion-finding, the retrieval system is tasked with retrieving not just relevant documents, but which also express an opinion towards the query target entity. Most opinion-finding systems are based on a two-stage approach, where initially the system aims to retrieve relevant documents, which are then re-ranked according to the extent to which they are detected to be of an opinionated nature. In this work, we investigate how the underlying 'baseline' retrieval system performance affects the overall opinion-finding performance. We apply two effective opinion-finding techniques to all the baseline runs submitted to the TREC 2007 Blog track, and draw new insights and conclusions.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
D. Hannah, C. Macdonald, B. He, J. Peng, and I. Ounis. University of Glasgow at TREC 2007: Experiments in Blog and Enterprise Tracks with Terrier. In Proceedings of TREC 2007.
2
 
3
C. Macdonald, I. Ounis, and I. Soboroff. Overview of the TREC 2007 Blog Track. In Proceedings of TREC 2007.
 
4
I. Ounis, M. de Rijke, C. Macdonald, G. Mishne, and I. Soboroff. Overview of the TREC 2006 Blog Track. In Proceedings of TREC 2006.
 
5


Collaborative Colleagues:
Craig Macdonald: colleagues
Ben He: colleagues
Iadh Ounis: colleagues
Ian Soboroff: colleagues