ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Enhancing solution quality of the biobjective graph coloring problem using hybridization of EA: biobjective graph coloring problem
Full text PdfPdf (531 KB)
Source
Genetic And Evolutionary Computation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 10th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation table of contents
Atlanta, GA, USA
SESSION: Evolutionary combinatorial optimization papers table of contents
Pages 547-554  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-130-9
Authors
Rajeev Kumar  Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, India
Paresh Tolay  Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, India
Siddharth Tiwary  Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, India
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGEVO: ACM Special Interest Group on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 83,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1389095.1389203
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We consider a formulation of the biobjective soft graph coloring problem so as to simultaneously minimize the number of colors used as well as the number of edges that connect vertices of the same color. We solve this problem using well-known multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (MOEA), and observe that they show good diversity and (local) convergence. Then, we consider and adapt the single objective heuristics to yield a Pareto-front and observe that the quality of solutions obtained by MOEAs is much inferior. We incorporate the problem specific knowledge into representation and reproduction operators, in an incremental way, and get good quality solutions using MOEAs too. The spin-off point we stress with this work is that, for real world applications of unknown nature, it is indeed difficult to realize how good/bad the quality of the solutions obtained is.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
H. Al-Omari and K. E. Sabri. New graph coloring algorithms. Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, pages 739--741, 2006.
 
2
S. Bhowmick and P. Hovland. A backtracking correction heuristic for improving performance of graph coloring algorithms. 2nd Int. Workshop on Combinatorial Scientific Computing, 2005.
3
4
 
5
 
6
C. Croitoru, H. Luchian, O. Gheorghies, and A. Apetrei. A new genetic graph coloring heuristic. Proceedings of the Computational Symposium on Graph Coloring and its Generalizations, 63--74, 2002.
 
7
J. Culberson. Iterated greedy graph coloring and the difficulty landscape. Technical Report TR 92--07, 1992.
 
8
 
9
K. Deb and R. B. Agrawal. Simulated binary crossover for continuous search space. Complex Systems, 9:115--148, 1995.
 
10
K. Deb and S. Jain. Running performance metrics for evolutionary multiobjective optimization. In SEAL, Singapore, pages 13--20, November 2002.
 
11
 
12
A. Eiben and J. van der Hauw. Graph coloring with adaptive genetic algorithms. Technical Report TR 96--11, Leiden University, August 1996.
 
13
 
14
 
15
E. Falkenauer. A hybrid grouping genetic algorithm for bin packing. Journal of Heuristics, 2:5--30, 1996.
 
16
 
17
P. Galinier and J.-K. Hao. Hybrid evolutionary algorithms for graph coloring. Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, 3(4):379--397, 1999.
 
18
F. Huang and G. Chen. A symmetry-breaking approach of the graph coloring problem with gas. Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design, 2004. Proceedings. The 8th International Conference on, 2:717--719 Vol.2, 26--28 May 2004.
 
19
 
20
R. M. Karp. Reducibility among combinatorial problems. In R. E. Miller and J. W. Thatcher, editors, Complexity of Computer Computations, pages 85--103. Plenum Press, 1972.
 
21
 
22
R. Kumar, P. K. Singh, A. P. Singhal, and A. Bhartia. Evolutionary and heuristic algorithms for 0-1 knapsack problem. In 10th Online World Conf. Soft Computing & Indutrial Applications, Applications of Soft Computing: Recent Trends, 2005.
 
23
A. Marino, A. Prugel-Bennett, and C. Glass. Improving graph colouring with linear programming and genetic algorithms. In K. Miettinen, M. M. Makela, and J. Toivanen (Eds.), Proceedings of EUROGEN99, Jyvaskyla, Finland, 113--118, 1999.
24
 
25
A. Mehrotra and M. A. Trick. A column generation approach for graph coloring. INFORMS Journal on Computing, 8:344--354, 1996.
 
26
C. Mumford. New order-based crossovers for the graph coloring problem. In Parallel Problem Solving from Nature -- PPSN IX, pages 880--889, Reykjavik, Iceland, September 2006. LNCS 4193, Springer.
 
27
E. Ryan, R. M. A. Azad, and C. Ryan. On the performance of genetic operators and the random key representation. In Genetic Programming, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 162--173, Berlin/Heidelberg, 2004. Springer.
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
J. Zoellner and C. Beall. A breakthrough in spectrum conserving frequency assignment technology. IEEE Trans Electromag Compat, EMC--19:313--319, 1977.
 
32
D. Zuckerman. Linear degree extractors and the inapproximability of max clique and chromatic number. Theory of Computing, 3(6):103--128, 2007.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Rajeev Kumar: colleagues
Paresh Tolay: colleagues
Siddharth Tiwary: colleagues