ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Content-based image retrieval via distributed databases
Full text PdfPdf (420 KB)
Source
Conference On Image And Video Retrieval archive
Proceedings of the 2008 international conference on Content-based image and video retrieval table of contents
Niagara Falls, Canada
POSTER SESSION: Poster/reception table of contents
Pages 389-394  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-070-8
Authors
Kambiz Jarrah  Ryerson University, Toronto, ON, Canada
Ling Guan  Ryerson University, Toronto, ON, Canada
Sponsors
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
SIGMULTIMEDIA: ACM Special Interest Group on Multimedia
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 25,   Downloads (12 Months): 276,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1386352.1386402
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The overall objective of this paper is to present an extended application of Content-Based Image Retrieval (CBIR) over distributed (decentralized) image databases. Traditional image retrieval system design has implicitly relied on a local (centralized) query server, such as IBM's QBIC [1], Columbia's VisualSEEk [2], MIT's PhotoBook [3], and UCSD's Viagem™ [4]. With the growing popularity of the internet, however, the focus of the research in this area has been shifted toward content query over distributed databases. Ng et al. [5] has studied a peer-clustering model for the query with the assumption that the image collection at each peer node falls under one category. Even though, this assumption is effective for preliminary studies, it is unable to implant the practical end-user behaviors. Lee et al. [6] has introduced a novel approach to study practical scenarios where multiple image categories exist in each individual database in the distributed storage network. This approach is proven to be an effective method to improve retrieval precision via identifying the community neighborhood who shares similar content collection. The main focus of this paper is to study behavior of a CBIR engine in an interactive distributed environment. In the proposed approach, the query image is sent to all registered databases in the network. Response of each database is then collected and transferred to a local server where a supervised relevance identification approach is applied to identify final outcome of the search. Response of each database is quantified via estimating the statistical resemblance of top image candidates to the existing query image. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate feasibility of the proposed methodology.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
 
3
 
4
Bach J. R., Fuller C., Gupta A., Hampapur A., Horowitz B., Humphrey R., Jain R. C., and Shu C., 1996. Virage image search engine: an open framework for image management. In Symposium on Electronic Imaging: Science and Technology - Storage & Retrieval for Image and Video Databases IV.
 
5
Ng C. H. and Sia K. C., Peer clustering and firework query model, in Poster Proc. of the 11th World Wide Web Conference, 2002.
 
6
Lee I., and Guan L. 2004. Semi-Automated Relevance Feedback for Distributed Content Based Image Retrieval, Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, Taipei, Taiwan, pp. 1871--1874.
 
7
Gevers T. and Smeulders A. W. M., PicToSeek: Combining color and shape invariant features for image retrieval, IEEE Trans. on Image Processing, Vol. 9, pp. 102--119, 2000.
 
8
Lee I., and Guan L. 2004. Content--Based Image Retrieval with Automated Relevance Feedback over Distributed Peer-to-Peer Network, Proc. Of IEEE Int. Sym. on Circuits and Systems, Vancouver, Canada. pp. 5--8.
 
9
Muneesawang P., Guan L. 2000. A Non-Linear RBF Model For Adaptive Content-Based Image Retrieval, Int. Symp. on Multimedia Information Processing, pp: 188--191, University of Sydney, Australia.
 
10
Jarrah K., Kyan M., Krishnan S., and Guan L. 2006. Computational Intelligence Techniques and Their Applications in Content-Based Image Retrieval, IEEE Int. Conf. on Multimedia & Expo, pp. 33--36, Toronto, Canada.
 
11
Kohonen T. 1990. The self-organizing map, Proc. of the IEEE, Vol. 78, Issue 9, pp. 1464 -- 1480.
 
12
Kong H. S., The Self-Organizing Tree Map and its Applications in Digital Image Processing, Doctoral Thesis. University of Sydney, Australia, 1998.
 
13
 
14
Muneesawang P., Wong H. S., Lay J., and Guan L. 2001. Learning and Adaptive Characterization of Visual Contents in Image Retrieval Systems, In: Y.H. Hu and J.-N. Hwang, Handbook of Neural Network Signal Processing, CRC Press LLC, Chapter 11.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Kambiz Jarrah: colleagues
Ling Guan: colleagues